There has been tremendous controversy ever since NASA announced that they wouldn’t sending astronauts to repair and upgrade the aging Hubble Space Telescope. An independent report delivered to the agency says that even sending a robotic mission to repair the observatory is probably a bad idea – it would be too costly and risky. A robotic mission might take $2 billion or more to develop, might not reach Hubble in time, and probably only has a 50% chance of succeeding – it would be more cost effective to launch a new observatory with the instruments built for Hubble.
Through the Artemis Program, NASA will send the first astronauts to the Moon since the…
New research suggests that our best hopes for finding existing life on Mars isn’t on…
Entanglement is perhaps one of the most confusing aspects of quantum mechanics. On its surface,…
Neutrinos are tricky little blighters that are hard to observe. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory in…
A team of astronomers have detected a surprisingly fast and bright burst of energy from…
Meet the brown dwarf: bigger than a planet, and smaller than a star. A category…