A new satellite map from Google and Digital Globe shows just-released satellite imagery of the damage from the tornado that struck the area of Moore, Oklahoma on May 20, 2013. It’s been called one of the most powerful and destructive tornadoes ever recorded — determined to be an EF5 tornado, the strongest rating for a tornado — and the destruction is heartbreaking. In the screenshot above, you can see how some houses were left undamaged, while others were completely destroyed.
Click on the image above to have access to an interactive map that shows hi-resolution views of the damage, providing details of where the buildings and houses once were. NPR put this map together, using satellite data from Digital Globe, along with property data from City of Oklahoma City, City of Moore, and Cleveland County. Satellite data like this are helping to assist the recovery and rescue teams on the ground.
In the immediate aftermath of a natural catastrophe such as this tornado, the priority is searching for survivors and saving lives.
But longer term recovery — including the rebuilding of infrastructure and amenities such as schools and hospitals — can take decades, and satellite imagery can provide a systematic approach to aiding, monitoring and evaluating this process.
See more satellite views from NASA of the storm and aftermath on NASA Goddard’s Flickr page for this tornado.
The Take Part website has a list of organizations that are providing support for the recovery and care of the people affected, if you would like to contribute.
the tornado almost seems to follow the road a bit, even bending at the bend of the road ….
Might that be a useful tool? Creating heat soaking roads around a village?
Wow, it looks like every school in the town was directly in the path of the tornado, talk about bad luck. Do schools in tornado prone areas like Oklahoma have emergency procedures/shelters for disasters like this?
All schools in Oklahoma have tornado procedures and practice them often. Shelters are not nearly as prevalent as they should be.
Dang… If I lived there and didn’t have a concrete shelter… I’d be building one today.. Sheesh… and dzzzz… Didja see that guy who’s shelter was the only thing standing in the hood? AC/DC TV to watch the storm and all buttoned up!
Its all about the “$” with tornado shelters in schools. Sad but true.
Were economically possible, underground storm-shelters can have their own hazards. If rescuers don’t arrive in time, you could be entombed under a ton of debris. A one-piece, ground-embedded, capsule-like storm-shelter out in the open for a family could work. Apart from available space, who can be sure were debris piles may come to rest?
Clay soil conditions in some Plain-regions are not favorable for underground structures, I’ve read. In some locations, bedrock is deep buried under moist earth, subject to the daily, seasonal, expansion-contraction of heat and cold. A not well-anchored house could, over years, be undermined, weakened over an unstable, below-ground basement, absent a firm-foundation.
“Money remains a big obstacle for building storm shelters. Basements … can add as much as 10 percent to the overall cost [ imagine the price for a school or hospital ]. … Basements aren’t the answer because unless you have a concrete ceiling, it’ll be a hole in the ground filled with debris.” — Curtis McCarty, Oklahoma home builder. ( ABC News )
Rapid formation, and touchdown location of a tornado, as with sudden visit of this devouring whirlwind, may not afford sufficient time for mass-sheltering before it hits — where safe refuge is not easily accessible, and nearby: large numbers of people moved quickly into a safe location.
“Virtually no ground-level building can withstand the fiercest tornadoes, with winds of more than 200 miles per hour. But it might be possible to design schools and other public buildings to make parts of them less vulnerable. ‘We need to get architects and engineers together to see if something can be designed’ to provide a better level of safety at reasonable cost per life saved,”… — Kevin Simmons, natural disaster economist. ( The Daily Beast )