Put another checkmark beside the “cold dark matter” theory. New observations by Japan’s Subaru Telescope are helping astronomers get a grip on the density of dark matter, this mysterious substance that pervades the universe.
We can’t see dark matter, which makes up an estimated 85 percent of the universe, but scientists can certainly measure its gravitational effects on galaxies, stars and other celestial residents. Particle physicists also are on the hunt for a “dark matter” particle — with some interesting results released a few weeks ago.
The latest experiment with Subaru measured 50 clusters of galaxies and found that the density of dark matter is largest in the center of these clusters, and smallest on the outskirts. These measurements are a close match to what is predicted by cold dark matter theory, scientists said.
Cold dark matter assumes that this material can’t be observed in any part of the electromagnetic spectrum, the band of light waves that ranges from high-energy X-rays to low-energy infrared heat. Also, the theory dictates that dark matter is made up of slow-moving particles that, because they collide with each other infrequently, are cold. So, the only way dark matter interacts with other particles is by gravity, scientists have said.
To check this out, Subaru peered at “gravitational lensing” in the sky — areas where the light of background objects are bent around dense, massive objects in front. Galaxy clusters are a prime example of these super-dense areas.
“The Subaru Telescope is a fantastic instrument for gravitational lensing measurements. It allows us to measure very precisely how the dark matter in galaxy clusters distorts light from distant galaxies and gauge tiny changes in the appearance of a huge number of faint galaxies,” stated Nobuhiro Okabe, an astronomer at Academia Sinica in Taiwan who led the study.
Next, the team members could compare where the matter was most dense with that predicted by cold dark matter theory. To do that, they measured 50 of the most massive, known clusters of galaxies. Then, they measured the “concentration parameter”, or the cluster’s average density.
“They found that the density of dark matter increases from the edges to the center of the cluster, and that the concentration parameter of galaxy clusters in the near universe aligns with CDM theory,” stated the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan.
The next step, researchers stated, is to measure dark matter density in the center of the galaxy clusters. This could reveal more about how this substance behaves. Check out more about this study in Astrophysical Journal Letters.
But slow moving particles will eventually gravitate towards each other and turn into a planet/star?
Slow moving baryonic (standard) matter will form stars, while DM will just tend to form blobs in the gravity wells.
IIRC it happens because standard matter can aggregate by 1) heating up under interactions, 2) dissipate (radiate) away heat and so 3) having the resulting system heat in the middle but cool on average, clumping up in hot gas balls (stars) and cool protoplanetary disks.
This raises an interesting question which I had never considered: presumably a sufficiently dense clump of dark matter could form a black hole or even a SMBH, right?
Gravitation by itself weakly interacts and does not dissipate energy readily. A cloud of N bodies interacting by gravitation will settle into a configuration where the kinetic energy of these bodies is half the potential energy. The energy will drop by ejecting some set of these bodies away from the system. It is analogous to evaporative cooling. The number of bodies ejected n is much less than N = original number of bodies, or n << N. As a result dark matter clouds are fairly stable and do not clump much further.
There must be other interactions, such as electromagnetism, nuclear and weak interaction forces that send the kinetic energy of the system away. This is usually in the form of radiation, such as electromagnetic radiation. Dark matter regions of course form gravitational potential wells that attract ordinary matter, and this matter can interact in ways that dissipates away energy.
LC
yes,it true that dark matter is less near the galactic core & more outside. Is CDM exist? if yes, then how it interact with white matter[visible matter]? soon i explain something new.
– These results shows (the expected ) result of highest concentration in the center of an average galaxy cluster and less outside, as seen in figure 2. I don’t see how one can misread the figure and the figure explanation, it is a simple “heat” map.
– DM can be observed in the WMAP and Planck temperature fluctuation angular spectra as the relation between the peak 2 and 3, the first two acoustic peaks. The former shows large scales density variations and the latter small scales, and the two particle constituents behave differently. One can also extract dark energy from peak 1 and 3, since the first non-acoustic peak correlates with all energy content.
– DM doesn’t interact much with BM (baryonic matter), which is why it is hard to detect on Earth. DM researchers try with large pools of water, hoping to to see just a few interactions/year.
“when i confused, i go to basic”
1st we have to understand Dark Atom, Dark Matter & Dark Energy [-there origin, their property] & then how all interact with each other & our BM
“out of box thinking required”
But that precisely the wrong way around. In science, you start with what we observe, and work from there toward an understanding of why. We have observed that there is matter that exhibits gravity (because it affects, for instance, the rotational speed of galaxies), but which does not appear to interact strongly with baryonic matter in other ways (as seen in the Bullet Cluster observations, etc.). And how do we make these observations? By watching how it interacts with baryonic matter!
Here’s the free (PDF) paper:
LoCuSS: The Mass Density Profile of Massive Galaxy Clusters at z=0.2.
Impressive!
I’m becoming slightly allergic to left out constraints since I’ve started to read cosmology papers. “We can’t see dark matter, which makes up an estimated 85 percent of [the matter of] the universe,” is more like it. Since matter is (mostly) just a specific form of energy in cosmology.
The multiverse theory of space, or why we don’t need dark energy and dark matter – http://youtu.be/t80qywmnADM