Jack Farmer, a professor of geological sciences, presented his work at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science in San Francisco. Instead of performing exobiology – where rovers look for current life – he thinks exopaleontology will be easier.
The problem with looking for life right now is that it requires liquid water. And finding liquid water on the surface of Mars is going to be very tough. If it’s there at all, liquid water is going to be underground or under thick sheets of ice. But fossilized bacteria might just be sitting right there on the surface of Mars, waiting for a rover to scoop it up and analyze it.
Instead of looking for liquid water, you just need to find a location where water once existed for some period of time. For example, where the Mars Exploration Rovers, Spirit and Opportunity, are currently roaming. In order to see fossilized bacteria, the rovers would need to be equipped with extremely sensitive microscopes and organic chemistry laboratories to analyze promising rocks.
It won’t be easy, but it’s probably easier than getting to liquid water.
Original Source: ASU News Release
On November 26th, 2018, NASA's Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy, and Heat Transport (InSight)…
Black holes are incredible powerhouses, but they might generate even more energy thanks to an…
According to the United Nations, the world produces about 430 million metric tons (267 U.S.…
As we saw with JWST, it's difficult and expensive to launch large telescope apertures, relying…
Voyager 1 was launched waaaaaay back in 1977. I would have been 4 years old…
The spectra of distant galaxies shows that dying sun-like stars, not supernovae, enrich galaxies the…