Part of the Milky Way Is Much Older Than Previously Believed

The Milky Way is older than astronomers thought, or part of it is. A newly-published study shows that part of the disk is two billion years older than we thought. The region, called the thick disk, started forming only 0.8 billion years after the Big Bang.

A pair of astronomers pieced together the Milky Way’s history in more detail than ever. Their results are based on detailed data from the ESA’s Gaia mission and China’s Large Sky Area Multi-Object Fiber Spectroscopic Telescope (LAMOST). The key to this discovery lies in subgiant stars.

The paper is “A time-resolved picture of our Milky Way’s early formation history,” and it’s online in the journal Nature. The authors are Maosheng Xiang and Hans-Walter Rix, both from the Max-Planck Institute for Astronomy (MPIA.)

“Our results provide exquisite details about that part of the Milky Way, such as its birthday, its star-formation rate and metal enrichment history. Putting together these discoveries using Gaia data is revolutionizing our picture of when and how our galaxy was formed.”

Maosheng Xiang, study co-author, MPIA.

One of the most difficult things to determine about a star is its age. A star’s composition, or metallicity, is key to finding its age. The more accurately astronomers can measure metallicity, the more accurately they can determine its age. The early Universe contained hydrogen and helium almost exclusively. Elements heavier than hydrogen and helium are produced in stars and spread out into the Universe when those stars die and explode. Astronomers call every element heavier than the two primordial elements “metals.”

Stars with lower metallicity are older because they formed when mostly just hydrogen and helium were available. So when astronomers identify a population of stars mainly containing hydrogen and helium, they know those stars are older. When they find a population of stars with higher proportions of metals, they know those stars must be younger.

Precision age measurements are the holy grail in some aspects of astronomy, which is true in this case. Xiang and Rix used more than just metallicity to determine stellar ages. They focused on a specific type of star: subgiants. The subgiant phase in a star’s life is relatively brief, so astronomers can determine a star’s age most accurately when it’s a subgiant. Subgiants are transitioning to red giants and no longer produce energy in their cores. Instead, fusion has moved into a shell around the core.

This figure from the study shows some of the detail for the 247,000 subgiant stars in the sample. (a) shows the subgiant selection by magnitude and temperature. (b) shows the distribution in the relative age precision as a function of age. Image Credit: Xhiang and Rix 2022.

In this study, the pair of scientists used LAMOST data to determine the metallicity of about 250,000 stars in different parts of the Milky Way. They also used Gaia data which gives the precise position and brightness data for about 1.5 billion stars.

The ESA’s Gaia mission is responsible for increased accuracy in this study and many others. Before Gaia, astronomers routinely worked with stellar age uncertainties between 20% to 40%. That meant that ages could be off by one billion years, which is a lot. But Gaia has changed all this. The current data release from the mission is Gaia EDR 3 or Early Data Release 3, and it’s a vast improvement. EDR3 gives precise 3D positions of over 330,000 stars. It also gives high-precision measurements of the stars’ motions through space.

The researchers used all this data from Gaia and LAMOST and compared it to known models of stellar parameters to determine the subgiants’ ages with greater accuracy. “With Gaia’s brightness data, we are able to determine the age of a subgiant star to a few percent,” said Maosheng. The subgiants are spread throughout the different parts of the Milky Way, allowing the researchers to piece together the ages of the other components and build a timeline of the Milky Way’s history.

The study shows two distinct phases in our galaxy’s history. The first phase started 0.8 billion years ago when the thick disk began forming stars. The galactic halo’s inner regions started to develop too. Two billion years after that, a merger propelled the star formation in the thick disk to completion. A dwarf galaxy named Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus merged with the Milky Way.

An artist’s impression of our Milky Way galaxy, a roughly 13 billion-year-old barred spiral galaxy that is home to a few hundred billion stars. On the right, an edge-on view reveals the flattened shape of the disc. Observations point to a substructure: a thin disc some 700 light-years high embedded in a thick disc, about 3000 light-years high, populated with older stars. The new study shows that the thick disc started forming stars only 0.8 billion years after the Big Bang, about two billion years sooner than thought. Image Credit: NASA/JPL-Caltech; right: ESA; layout: ESA/ATG medialab

The Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus (GSE) dwarf galaxy isn’t shaped like a sausage. It gets its name from plotting its stars on a velocity chart, where their orbits are highly-elongated. When GSE merged with the Milky Way, it helped create the thick disk, and the gas that came with it fuelled the star formation in that part of the galaxy. The merger also filled the Milky Way’s halo with stars. Astronomers think the globular cluster NGC 2808 might be the Gaia Sausage’s remnant core. NGC 2808 is one of the most massive globular clusters in the Milky Way.

The star formation triggered in the thick disk by the GSE lasted for about 4 billion years. About 6 billion years after the Big Bang, the gas was all used up. During that period, the thick disk’s metallicity increased by more than a factor of ten.

The study also found a very tight correlation between the metallicity and the ages of the stars in the entire disk. That means that the gas that came with the GSE must have been turbulent, causing it to mix more thoroughly in the disk.

Astronomers only recently discovered the GSE merger in 2018. Discoveries like it have shaped our understanding of the Milky Way’s history, and the galaxy’s developmental timeline is becoming clearer. This new study is giving us a more detailed account.

The NGC 2808 star cluster might be the remnant of the Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus galaxy that merged with the Milky Way billions of years ago. Credit: NASA, ESA, A. Sarajedini (University of Florida) and G. Piotto (University of Padova)

“Since the discovery of the ancient merger with Gaia-Sausage-Enceladus, in 2018, astronomers have suspected that the Milky Way was already there before the halo formed, but we didn’t have a clear picture of what that Milky Way looked like. Our results provide exquisite details about that part of the Milky Way, such as its birthday, star-formation rate and metal enrichment history. Putting together these discoveries using Gaia data is revolutionizing our picture of when and how our galaxy was formed,” says Maosheng.

In recent years astronomers have discovered more detail about the Milky Way. But it’s challenging to map its structure because we’re in the middle of it. The ESA’s Gaia mission is our best catalogue yet of the stars in the Milky Way. And each data release gets better and better.

“With each new analysis and data release, Gaia allows us to piece together the history of our galaxy in even more unprecedented detail. With the release of Gaia DR3 in June, astronomers will be able to enrich the story with even more details,” says Timo Prusti, Gaia Project Scientist for ESA.

The Gaia mission is essential, but observations of other galaxies like the Milky Way also give astronomers insights into the Milky Way’s structure and history. But observing galaxies only two billion years after the Big Bang is difficult. That requires powerful infrared telescopes. Fortunately, one long-awaited infrared space telescope is about to begin observations soon.

The James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) has the power to look back in time to the Universe’s early years. It’ll be able to see the Universe’s earliest Milky Way-like galaxies. Astronomers want to know more about the GSE merger and how it led to star formation and shaped our galaxy’s thick disk only two billion years after the Big Bang. JWST observations of ancient, high-redshift galaxies similar to the Milky Way could help answer some questions and fill in a more detailed galactic history.

The James Webb Space Telescope was built to answer some of our biggest questions about the early Universe, including how the first galaxies formed. That question directly relates to how the Milky Way began and grew. Image Credit: ESA

And in June, the ESA will release Gaia’s full third data release, called DR3. The DR3 catalogue will contain ages, metallicity, and spectra for over 7 million stars. DR3 and the JWST will be a potent combination.

What will all of that data tell us?

As the Universe evolves, galaxies must either eat or be eaten. Gravity draws galaxies together, but the Universe is also expanding thanks to dark energy, and the dark energy pushes galaxies apart. So galaxies tend to clump together into groups. The Milky Way is part of the Local Group.

The groups stay internally coherent because of the galaxies’ combined gravity, but the groups drift away from one another due to expansion. Eventually, the largest galaxies in a group consume the smaller ones. The Milky Way has consumed the GSE and globular clusters. And it’s consuming the Large Magellanic Cloud, which is consuming its even smaller neighbour, the Small Magellanic Cloud. Eventually, the Milky Way will consume both, and then in about 4.5 billion years, it’ll merge with the even larger Andromeda Galaxy, another member of the Local Group.

It’s an odd situation because the Milky Way’s future might be easier to discern than its past. That’s the conundrum of an expanding Universe: the evidence we seek keeps receding from us, lost to time and distance. But the JWST and the Gaia DR3 have the potential to turn the tables on the expanding Universe. Together they can shed more light on the Milky Way’s history and on the details of galaxy mergers in general. Hopefully, we’ll end up with a much more thorough historical timeline.

More:

Evan Gough

Recent Posts

How Many Additional Exoplanets are in Known Systems?

NASA's TESS mission has turned up thousands of exoplanet candidates in almost as many different…

2 hours ago

Hubble and Webb are the Dream Team. Don't Break Them Up

Many people think of the James Webb Space Telescope as a sort of Hubble 2.…

8 hours ago

Scientists Have Figured out why Martian Soil is so Crusty

On November 26th, 2018, NASA's Interior Exploration using Seismic Investigations, Geodesy, and Heat Transport (InSight)…

16 hours ago

Another Way to Extract Energy From Black Holes?

Black holes are incredible powerhouses, but they might generate even more energy thanks to an…

22 hours ago

Plastic Waste on our Beaches Now Visible from Space, Says New Study

According to the United Nations, the world produces about 430 million metric tons (267 U.S.…

2 days ago

Future Space Telescopes Could be Made From Thin Membranes, Unrolled in Space to Enormous Size

As we saw with JWST, it's difficult and expensive to launch large telescope apertures, relying…

2 days ago