[/caption]
Don’t say you haven’t been warned. NASA put out an official document today specifying how close any future spacecraft and astronauts visiting the Moon can come to the artifacts left on the lunar surface by all US space missions, including the Apollo landing sites, any robotic landing sites like Surveyor and impact sites like LCROSS.
While these recommendations are not mandatory (there’s obviously no way to enforce this yet) the document states, “rather, it is offered to inform lunar spacecraft mission planners interested in helping preserve and protect lunar historic artifacts and potential science opportunities for future missions.”
For example, NASA recommends an artifact boundary extending 75 m from the Apollo 11 lunar module descent stage.
NASA isn’t expecting a rush of astro-looters to descend upon the Moon, but with China discussing a Moon landing, and with several Google Lunar X PRIZE teams hoping to send robotic landers, they want to make sure nothing from previous missions is disturbed.
“In the 50 years since the first lunar missions, the spaceflight community has not formally provided recommendations to the next generation of lunar explorers on how to preserve the original artifacts and protect ongoing science from the potentially damaging effects of nearby landers,” NASA said in an accompanying press release, saying that they recognize the steadily increasing technical capabilities of space-faring commercial entities and nations throughout the world that may be on the verge of landing spacecraft on the surface of the Moon.
The document specifies how close another spacecraft can hover, flyover, hop or touchdown near landing sites or spacecraft.
And not just hardware is included in the “don’t touch” areas: “U.S. human, human-robotic lunar presence, including footprints, rover tracks, etc., although not all anthropogenic indicators are protected as identified in the recommendations,” the document says.
NASA’s decisions on proximity boundaries were made from recommendations from external experts from the historic, scientific and flight-planning communities and apply to US government artifacts on the lunar surface.
NASA says they released this document to open discussions with commercial and international space agencies, and seek any improvements to the recommendations.
Read the full document here (pdf file).
Source: NASA
Conspiracy Theorists in 3, 2, 1…
Get it===>>> lot of fun, love and enjoy here.. http://www.year13.com.au/????????
@Marcos
NASA are right to protect their lunar (‘Flag Flutter’) wind machine and special in-photo cross-hair and star removal technology from prying eyes, aren’t they?
😉
You can still land and rove toward the perimeter and watch from a distance.
There goes my vacation plans!
I believe lunokhods and other non-american hardware should be included…
All human artifacts left on the moon should be included in this directive! You are so correct! Also the artifacts from the up-coming second wave of lunar exploration will need to be preserved as well, from whatever country that sends them: (Russia, China, India, The USA.)
Those other countries would probably not like NASA issuing directives or recommendations on their behalf, though.
This is true. But maybe an agreement or treaty between the nations that plan to, or are capable of landing on the moon is possible.
Of course NASA is right about protecting the historical artifacts on the Moon!
Haven’t we all gone to museums where everything has the ‘Please Do Not Touch (or take any photos)’ on the side? The same precautions should be taken with places of high historical importance like the Apollo landing sites.
“Going to the Moon? Don’t Touch the Historical Artifacts, NASA Says”
Rubbish. We humans are just too full of ourselves.
Rather like telling the citizens of Troy not to build new buildings upon the ruins of the old.
I wouldn’t mind getting myself a Lunar Rover. It’s all tax payer money so I say, “finders keepers”
Kinda like that guy who took a tank from a US armory for a spin through San Diego.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shawn_Nelson
I can already imagine a Futurama style amusement park built around the Apollo 11 landing site with a largely ignored exhibit of the descent stage and flag in the middle of the park.
“We’re whalers on the Moon,
We carry a harpoon.”
MOON BELONGS TO USG ,GO FIND ANOTHER PLACE TO EXPLORE
hope this haughtiness trigger a belligerent competition :0
I can understand why NASA would issue such a directive, but how the heck would they enforce it?
It will be as effective as a ‘ WET PAINT ‘ sign
They left all of that there as trash. Too heavy or did not have the technology to bring it back. Now they claim they are historical artifacts. Morons..
Actually there are some artifacts that are still being used: i.e. the laser reflector etc. But from a purely historical standpoint these sites are invaluable to us now and to future generations, and should be protected for that reason. Today here on Earth, one of the most sought after sites for archaeologists are the waste dumps of long gone Peoples. These places tell us volumes about what these people ate, how they worked, the level of their technological sophistication, etc. etc. Far from being “Morons” this effort to preserve these sites by NASA is a forward looking directive and in our best interests as a Nation, even as a species.
Too late….
http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/moondrive.jpg
Too late…..
http://www.ssrichardmontgomery.com/download/moondrive.jpg
And I was hoping to actually see Apollo 15’s Lunar Rover in a Chinese museum some time in the next twenty years…
The Apollo moon missions were faked in a studio. Here’s a link to some of the proof.
spurstalk (dot) com/forums/showthread (dot) php?t=144487