Stars Form Better in the Cosmic Suburbs

spitzerfilaments.thumbnail.jpg

Galaxies, like people, tend to stick together. These galaxies collect together into communities large and small, called clusters and even superclusters. According to new research gathered by NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope, stars seem to form better in the cosmic suburbs of these clusters.

Galaxy clusters can be enormous, locking together thousands of galaxies into a mutual gravitational dance. Seen from afar, these groups of galaxies form large blobs (the clusters) linked together by spider web-like filaments that stretch for millions of light-years. The filaments contain the smaller collections of galaxies working their way towards the largest clusters.

Spitzer’s infrared view revealed two of these filaments in the galaxy cluster Abell 1763. Galaxies are traveling along these filaments, and will eventually collide with the larger cluster itself.

The researchers used Spitzer to measure the rates of star formation in both filaments and the larger galaxy cluster itself. They found that the filaments have much higher rates of star formation than the cluster.

“This is the first time we’ve ever seen a filament leading into a cluster with an infrared telescope,” says Dario Fadda, of the Herschel Science Center, which is located at the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, California. “Our observations show that the fraction of starburst galaxies in the filaments is more than double the number of starburst galaxies inside the cluster region.”

Upcoming space missions, such as ESA’s Herschel Space Telescope, will take these infrared observations to the next level, watching how filaments and clusters affect the growth of galaxies in greater detail.

Original Source: NASA/Spitzer News Release

Natural Particle Accelerator Dwarfs the Power of the Large Hadron Collider

posterb_h.thumbnail.jpg

Years of work are about to pay off, as Europe’s Large Hadron Collider is almost ready to come online. Soon physicists will be awash in data from the highly energetic particle collisions generated in the facility. But Nature, as usual, already has the upper hand, with a natural particle accelerator capable of pushing particles with 20 times as much energy as the LHC.

ESA’s Integral gamma ray observatory has been watching one of the brightest X-ray regions in the sky, known as the Ophiuchus galaxy cluster. And it’s turned up evidence that the violent region is acting like a natural particle accelerator, pushing electrons to enormous energies.

What kind of environment could create this?

You think the Sun is hot, clocking at a few thousand degrees Kelvin. But the gas in Ophiuchus is more than 100 million degrees Kelvin. Ophiuchus actually contains two galaxies clusters in the process of merging. The violence of this merger sends intense shockwaves rippling through the superheated gas.

The researchers are considering two specific mechanisms for how these X-rays are produced, and are planning follow-up observations to understand it better. In one situation, electrons are caught in the magnetic field threading through the cluster. As they spiral around, they would release the X-ray radiation. In a second scenario, the electrons would actually carry 100,000 times as much energy, and might be colliding with the background microwave radiation in the Universe, left over from the Big Bang.

It’s this X-ray radiation that Integral spotted.

Ophiuchus is able to give particles 20 times as much energy as researcher are hoping to coax out of the Large Hadron Collider.

“Of course the Ophiuchus cluster is somewhat bigger,” says Stéphane Paltani, a member of the team. While LHC is 27 km across, the Ophiuchus galaxy cluster is over two million light-years in diameter.”

Original Source: ESA News Release

A Nova Doesn’t Create, It Destroys

kecktelescopes-browse.thumbnail.jpg
The Keck telescopes, located atop Mauna Kea, Hawaii. Credit: W.M. Keck Observatory

Astronomers used to think that brief stellar eruptions called novae generated massive amounts of dust. But new observations of a well known nova system called RS Ophiuchus shows that isn’t the case. The dust was there already, and a nova blast just clears it all away.

The discovery was made using the massive Keck Interferometer, where the two 10-metre (33 feet) Keck telescopes on Hawaii’s Mauna Kea are merged together into a single super-telescope. It’s not like some kind of Japanese anime robot linking together; the telescopes just sit there. All the merging is done behind the scenes, through optics, electronics, and computers.

The Keck Interferometer can null the light coming from a star, revealing its surroundings. This allows the combined instrument to see objects with 10 times more resolving power than a single telescope working alone.

This “nulling mode” is largely used to reveal planet-forming disks of gas and dust surrounding distant stars. With the nuller blocking the starlight, the dimmer disk can be revealed.

In this recent observation, the Keck Interferometer observed a nova in a star surrounded by a dusty disk. The system contains a white dwarf and a red giant. The red giant is shedding its outside layers, while the white dwarf is gobbling it up.

Once a certain amount of matter piles up on the surface of the white dwarf, it explodes in a bright nova. This star has had 5 outburst over the last 100 years, so astronomers knew it would be flaring up again shortly.

The astronomers didn’t see any dust in the inner regions near the star – it was probably vaporized in the explosion. But around 20 times the Earth-sun distance, the researchers did see the dust again.

This flies in the face of what we expected. Astronomers had previously thought that nova explosions actually create dust,” said Richard Barry of Goddard, lead author of the paper on the observations that will appear in the Astrophysical Journal. They were expecting the nova to generate the dust. But instead, the dust was already there, and the nova just illuminated it.

The researchers now think that the dust is created as the star passes through the red giant’s wind, creating a pinwheel pattern around it. The denser regions in this pinwheel are cool enough to stick together to form dust particles. The blast wave from the nova destroys the pinwheel of dust, but it’ll reform again in the next few years.

Ready for another nova blast to blow it all apart again.

Original Source: NASA/JPL News Release

Podcast: Questions Show #8

listenerquestions.thumbnail.jpg

We’ve been so crazy following our own whims through the universe that we’ve neglected your questions. That ends today. It’s time to dig deep into our overflowing email box to retrieve the puzzling questions our listeners have sent in.

Click here to download the episode

Questions Show #8 – Show notes and transcript

Or subscribe to: astronomycast.com/podcast.xml with your podcatching software.

Comet Dust is Very Similar to Asteroids

stardust_comet252x215s.thumbnail.jpg

Just so it’s clear in your mind: comets are dirty snowballs, asteroids are rocks. Got the difference? Wait… not so fast. Scientists studying the cometary dust picked up by NASA’s Stardust spacecraft, and they’re finding it’s surprisingly asteroid like.

When Stardust flew past comet Wild 2 in 2006, scientists knew they would be scooping up materials created with the very formation of the solar system. But they didn’t think the dust from Wild 2 would resemble meteorites more than ancient, unaltered comet.

Comets are thought to contain large amounts of primitive material in the Solar System. Both the ancient ices that formed out of the stellar disk, but also the rain of interstellar material falling into the Solar System.

According to researchers at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, the particles that fell off Wild 2 formed very close to the Sun when it was young. They had been baked and blasted by the intense ultraviolet radiation of a newly forming star. Furthermore, they didn’t find the kind of primordial materials and ices that should have been present on an ancient comet like Wild 2.
Tracks of material captured by Stardust. Image credit: LLNL

“The material is a lot less primitive and more altered than materials we have gathered through high altitude capture in our own stratosphere from a variety of comets,” said LLNL’s Hope Ishii, lead author of the research that appears in the Jan. 25 edition of the journal, Science. “As a whole, the samples look more asteroidal than cometary.”

But Wild 2 is clearly a comet and not an asteroid. It’s got a tail; what could be more cometlike? It’s a reminder that there isn’t a clearly defined line between the two objects – there’s a continuum between them.

The researchers were expecting to see very specific minerals in the Stardust samples that should be coming from comets: glass with embedded metal and sulfides, and sliver-like whiskers of the crystallin silicate enstatite. They found only a single sample of enstatite in their samples and it was oriented the wrong way.

There were similar minerals found, but the researchers realized that they were being created when particles from the comet slammed into the Stardust collector. They were able to recreate this process in the lab.

For future studies, the researchers are hoping to get their hands on larger-grained materials, called micro-rocks. These would suffer less alteration from the impact with the Stardust collectors.

Original Source: LLNL News Release

Gigantic Storms on Jupiter Grow in a Single Day

hubble20080123-browse.thumbnail.jpg

As a giant planet, Jupiter takes everything to the extreme. Even the weather. A ferocious storm raging across the cloud tops has surprised scientists: it’s churning up material that was deeper down in the planet’s atmosphere. And there’s evidence that the planet’s jet streams are generated by its own heat, and not just from the Sun.

Even in the smallest telescope, it’s easy to see the distinct atmospheric bands that stretch around the planet, like a series of stripes. The strongest winds on the planet are at Jupiter’s northern latitudes. Here the winds can howl at 600 km per hour (370 miles per hour).

But astronomers have always wondered what drives these storms? Is it energy from the Sun, or is the planet’s own heat that gets the powerful jet streams driving winds across Jupiter.

In March 2007, several telescopes captured a rare atmospheric eruption, where two brand new storms appeared in the planet’s cloud tops.

The event was so well recorded because it coincided with the New Horizons spacecraft’s flyby with Jupiter. Many telescopes, including Hubble, NASA’s Infrared Telescope Facility, and a network of smaller telescopes around the world were making support observations of Jupiter.

An international team coordinated by Agustín Sánchez-Lavega from the Universidad del País Vasco in Spain presented their findings about this event in the January 24 issue of the journal Nature.

“Fortuitously, we captured the onset of the disturbance with Hubble, while monitoring the planet to support the New Horizons flyby observations of Jupiter in its route to Pluto. We saw the storm grow rapidly since its beginning, from about 400 kilometers [250 miles] to more than 2,000 kilometers [1,245 miles] in size in less than one day,” said Sánchez-Lavega.

With the storms, the researchers observed bright plumes of material. The newly forming storms pulled vast quantities of ammonia ice and water from deep below, and pushed it up 30 km (20 miles) above the cloud tops – higher than any other place on the planet.

By modeling the event, the researchers found that their observations supported the theory that Jupiter’s jet streams, which power the storm systems, come from much deeper inside the planet. Here on Earth, radiation from the Sun heats up the high atmosphere, and gets the jet streams going. But on Jupiter, it looks like the planet’s own heat drives these jet streams, and not the sunlight it receives.

Original Source: NASA/JPL News Release

Virgin Galactic Unveils SpaceShipTwo

Your trip to space is just around the corner now. In the next step in its goal of sending regular folk to space, Virgin Galactic today unveiled the vehicle that’s going to take them there: SpaceShipTwo. The announcement was made today at a press conference at the American Museum of Natural History in New York.

Actually, there were two vehicles revealed today: SpaceShipTwo, which will carry passengers on a suborbital trip into space, and the WhiteKnightTwo carrier.

The design, of course, is based on Scaled Composite’s SpaceShipOne vehicle, which won the $10 million Ansari X-Prize in October 2004.

According to Virgin Galactic, the WhiteKnightTwo mothership is almost complete, and should be ready for testing in summer, 2008. Once completed, it should be the world’s largest all carbon composite aircraft, capable of lifting SpaceShipTwo to high altitude.

Unlike SpaceShipOne, which had room for the pilot and two passengers, SpaceShipTwo will have room for eight paying passengers. Currently, the spacecraft is about 60% complete. Passengers will spent about 2.5 hours in the air, with about 5 minutes of actual weightlessness.
WhiteKnight2
There are some more differences. WhiteKnightTwo has an extra crew cabin; a recreation of the one inside SpaceShipTwo. This will give passengers a chance to experience a little taste of what the complete trip will be like. As part of its flight plan, WhiteKnightTwo spend some time taking a parabolic flight path – like NASA’s vomit comet – to give those passengers a little bit of weightlessness too.

The company says it’s already booked 200 people, with another 85,000 registrations of interest to fly. In fact, 80 of SpaceShipTwo’s potential passengers have already been through medical assessment and centrifuge training at a special facility in Philadelphia.

Sir Richard Branson, Founder of Virgin Galactic, was, of course, bubbling and enthusiastic in the press release: “The designs of both the mothership and the new spaceship are absolutely beautiful and surpass any expectations for the future of commercial spaceflight that we had when first registering the name Virgin Galactic in 1999. Burt and his team have done a fantastic job and I am also delighted with the wonderful vision that Foster and Partners, working with URS, have shown in the final designs for Spaceport America in New Mexico. Finally, we are all very excited about the prospect of being able to develop a bio-fuel solution for the space launch system and we are looking forward to working with Pratt and Whitney and Virgin Fuels to trial an appropriate bio mix for the PW308A engines that will be powering our new carrier aircraft.”

If all goes well, the first passengers will blast off on their suborbital journey in 2009.
Flight Process
Here’s a special treat. You can access all the press images if you like, to see all the different photographs released today.

Original Source: Virgin Galactic

Astrosphere for January 22, 2008

en0108830711m.thumbnail.png

The Lunar News Network is concerned about the potentially faltering plans to return to the Moon, and has some suggestions if you want to take action.

Chris Lintott wonders if the United Kingdom should contribute to the International Space Station.

Centauri Dreams discusses how long it takes Earth to recover from extinction events.

A Mars Odyssey reports on a booming business, in moon dirt.

Have there been UFOs over Texas? I was just in Texas, and would have loved to see UFOs. Anyway, back to the question… no. No aliens. Astroprof gives a much more detailed answer.

Instead of the Moon, some space enthusiasts are suggesting we visit asteroids instead. Personally, I like both ideas.

This isn’t exactly space, but it’s so well written that I couldn’t resist. Pamela Gay talks about the digital divide, and how she’s greeted with blank stares when she talks technology with others.

Phil hits the pseudoscientists with a one-two punch. No, asteroid 2007 TU24 isn’t going to hit the Earth. And no, that’s not bigfoot on the surface of Mars.

Pop quiz. Mercury or the Moon, which is which?

When Do Asteroids Turn Dangerous?

meteorcrater.thumbnail.jpg

One of the most spectacular sights in the night sky is a fireball; a rock from space impacts the atmosphere and blazes a trail that can last seconds or even minutes. These burn up harmlessly, but when do they turn dangerous? When do asteroids get large enough that they can actually get through the atmosphere and cause some destruction here on the ground?

During an invited talk at the Meteoroids 2007 conference held in Barcelona, Spain, Clark R. Chapman from the Southwest Research Institute delivered a presentation about how to define this line between harmless explosion in the sky and an impact that causes destruction here on the ground. The paper, entitled Meteoroids, Meteors, and the Near-Earth Object Impact Hazard was later published in the journal Earth, Moon and Planets.

Originally, researchers focused their efforts on the largest asteroids: the objects 2 km (1.2 miles) and above. These are the space rocks that could cause wide scale devastation across the planet, affecting the climate and leading the the deaths of hundreds of millions of people. It was calculated that an individual might have a 1-in-25,000 chance of dying in an asteroid impact.

Now that the Spaceguard Survey has discovered 75% of the asteroids 1 km and larger, your chances of dying have dropped to about 1-in-720,000. About the same chance as dying from a fireworks accident or amusement park ride.

According to Chapman, astronomers are now shifting their focus from the largest impacts – like the one that wiped out the dinosaurs 65 million years ago – to the smaller, but still dangerous space rocks. For example, the rock that detonated in the air above Tunguska, Siberia in 1908. That object was probably only between 20-100 metres (65-325 feet) across.

And yet, it leveled the forest for thousands of square kilometres and would have caused immense destruction if it had hit a populated area.

A new survey, informally called the Spaceguard Two Survey, will begin soon with the goal of finding 90% of the near-Earth asteroids larger than 140 metres (460 feet) within the next 15 years.

There are many variables that go into calculating the resulting destruction from an impact. You have to consider the velocity, if it’s a metallic or rocky asteroid, and whether it’s fragmented or not.

What should the response be of national and international emergency management officials to a prediction that a 35 m NEA will strike a populated country a decade in the future? Following current interpretations, we would simply tell people near ground-zero to stay inside and not look directly at the high-altitude explosion. But if objects of that size could cause Tunguska-like damage, we might not only evacuate people for 100 km surrounding ground-zero but we would certainly consider a space mission to move or blow-up the threatening NEA.

Originally, researchers thought that Tunguska level events happened once in 4,000 years, but it might be more common, maybe as often as 1-in-700. And perhaps even smaller, more common, asteroids could still cause destruction on the ground – 1-in-200 years.

If Spaceguard Two Survey gets going, it should locate most of the larger asteroids, but even 50% of the Tunguska-sized impactors. It will even be tracking 1-2 million 30 metre objects.

And if one of those rocks is on a collision course with Earth, governments and space agencies will be able to work out an evacuation or prevention strategy.

Or at least encourage people to avert their eyes.

Original Source: SWRI

2007 was Tied for the Second Hottest Year on Record

208481main_gcm_temp_anomaly_2003_2007_labeled0990.thumbnail.jpg

You weren’t imagining things, 2007 really was an unseasonably hot year. In fact, it was tied with 1998 for the second hottest year on record. All in all, the 8 warmest years have all occurred since 1998, and the 14 warmest years since 1990. This mini-record was announced by NASA climatologists this week.

Researchers from NASA’s Goddard Institute for Space Studies used temperature data from weather stations on land, satellite measurements of sea ice temperatures since 1982 and data from ships for earlier years.

“As we predicted last year, 2007 was warmer than 2006, continuing the strong warming trend of the past 30 years that has been confidently attributed to the effect of increasing human-made greenhouse gases,” said James Hansen, director of NASA GISS.

Perhaps the most warming occurred up in the Arctic and high latitude regions of the planet, where vast regions of ice melted away. In fact, the Northwest Passage opened up for the first time, and scientists are predicting that the region could be ice free in the Summer in less than a decade.

The lower ice levels in the Arctic provides more open water and reduces the amount of sunlight reflected back into space. This is expected to increase the rate of warming.

Let’s hope 2008 isn’t so hot.

Original Source: NASA News Release