Reader Meetup: January 8, 2008 in Austin

logo.thumbnail.jpg

Phil mentioned it on Bad Astronomy, Pamela dropped a note on Star Stryder, we chatted about it on Astronomy Cast. And here’s Universe Today’s compelling coverage…

I’m going to be in Austin for the Winter Meeting of the American Astronomical Society. In addition to all the news journalism, we thought we’d get some socializing done too. 🙂

Phil, Pamela, Rebecca, and I will be hosting a reader/listener meetup at the Iron Cactus in downtown Austin on January 8th at 8:00pm. Here’s a link that gives you directions from the Austin convention centre to the Iron Cactus.

If you’re going to be coming, can you drop me an email and let me know so we can gauge how many people might be there.

I look forward to meeting you all.

Podcast: Globular Clusters

m80.thumbnail.jpg

This week we’re going to study some of the most ancient objects in the entire Universe; globular clusters. These relics of the early Universe contain hundreds of thousands of stars, held together by their mutual gravity. Since they formed together, they give astronomers a unique way to test various theories of stellar evolution.

Click here to download the episode

Globular Clusters – Show notes and transcript

Or subscribe to: astronomycast.com/podcast.xml with your podcatching software.

2009 Will Be the International Year of Astronomy

2007-1220iya.thumbnail.jpg

Finally, astronomy is going to get the respect it deserves. The United Nations announced today that 2009 will be the International Year of Astronomy. There’ll be a concerted effort around the world to increase awareness about astronomy, and give people access to tools, techniques and knowledge.

The year coincides with 400 years since Galileo Galilei first pointed his telescope towards the heavens. He then went on to discover mountains and craters on the Moon, and the four major moons of Jupiter.

There are going to be many many events during the International Year of Astronomy. In fact, my Astronomy Cast co-host, Dr. Pamela Gay, is going to be the New Media Chair, and help administrate the IYA 2009 website. Apparently I’ve also been volunteered for several projects – I’ll keep you posted as the details are revealed to me.

You can access the International Year of Astronomy 2009 website here.

Original Source; IAU Press Release

Maybe Sulfur Dioxide, Not Carbon Dioxide, Kept Mars Warm

2007-1220mars.thumbnail.jpg

Try to walk on Mars today, and the planet will simultaneously freeze and suffocate you. Not to mention the minimal air pressure and relentless radiation from space. But billions of years ago, the Red Planet was much warmer and liquid water flowed on its surface. Warm temperatures on Earth are maintained by the carbon cycle, but maybe another greenhouse gas – sulfur dioxide (SO2) – maintained the temperatures on Mars.

This is the hypothesis put forward by Harvard and MIT researchers, published in the December 21st edition of the journal Science.

Over millions of years on Earth, our climate has been controlled by the carbon cycle. Carbon dioxide is released from volcanoes, and then chemical reactions with silicate rocks on the Earth’s surface remove it back out of the atmosphere and turn it into limestone.

There are vast deposits of limestone on Earth; evidence that the carbon cycle has been going on for eons. But planetary geologists haven’t found any limestone on Mars. If the planet was kept warm, the limestone should be there.

Perhaps another greenhouse gas, sulfur dioxide – also released in vast quantities from volcanoes – kept the atmosphere warm. On Earth, sulfur dioxide is removed quickly from the atmosphere, since it’s even more reactive with silicate rocks than carbon dioxide.

“The sulfur dioxide would essentially preempt the role of carbon dioxide in surface weathering reactions,” says Itay Halevy, the first author of the report. “The presence of even a small amount of sulfur dioxide in the atmosphere would contribute to the warmer climate, and also prevent limestone deposits from forming.”

So if this is true, sulfur minerals, and not limestone, should have formed in bodies of water. This may help to explain the surprising discovery the rovers have made that sulfur minerals are an abundant component of Martian soils.

With sulfur dioxide, the Martian oceans would have been much more acidic than Earth’s oceans. There might have been periods on Earth when our atmosphere was similar, and there could be similar periods when sulfur kept us warm too.

The similarities and differences of the two planets still have much to teach scientists.

Original Source: Harvard News Release

Carnival of Space #34

2007-1220galaxy.thumbnail.jpg

The 34th Carnival of Space has been posted to Rainer Gerhards’ Spaceflight blog. There are not one, but two lists of the top space photos in 2007. Enjoy galactic death rays, gravity suits for children, and scramjet research.

And if you’re interested in looking back, here’s an archive to all the past carnivals of space. If you’ve got a space-related blog, you should really join the carnival. Just email an entry to [email protected], and the next host will link to it. It will help get awareness out there about your writing, help you meet others in the space community – and community is what blogging is all about. And if you really want to help out, let me know if you can be a host, and I’ll schedule you into the calendar.

Supernova Generates Enough Dust for 10,000 Earths

2007-1220dust.thumbnail.jpg

My kids find it fascinating that the gold in the ring on my finger was formed in an instant when a massive star detonated in a supernova explosion. But it’s not just the heavier elements that get produced in a supernova, there’s also dust. Lots and lots of dust that can eventually collect together into new planets. And according to NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope, a typical supernova remnant called Cassiopeia A contains enough dust for 10,000 Earths.

This discovery helps solve one of the outstanding mysteries in astronomy: where did all the dust from the early Universe come from? After the Big Bang, the Universe was only made of hydrogen and helium, and a few trace heavier elements. The first stars formed from this primordial material, and then exploded as supernovae, producing the first heavier elements and the dust needed to make terrestrial planets.

Astronomers always thought that supernovae were prime contributors, recycling material in generation after generation, but they weren’t sure – until now.

Another source of this dust seems to be highly energetic black holes, called quasars, which might be firing out high speed jets and dust to seed solar systems.

The Spitzer observations of Cassiopeia A, located about 11,000 light-years away, showed that the warm and cold dust ejected during the supernovae explosion adds up to about 3% the mass of the Sun.

Their observations show that the dust contains proto-silicates, silicon dioxide, iron oxide, pyroxene, carbon, aluminium oxide and other compounds. You could fashion 10,000 planets with the mass of the Earth with that much material.

Although Cassiopeia A is nearby, and not one of those first stars, it wasn’t working with the same raw primordial materials. But the research shows that exploding massive stars do a fine job of turning raw hydrogen and helium into the dust needed to form planets like Earth.

Original Source: Spitzer News Release

ET Would Know There’s Life on Earth

2007-1220earth.thumbnail.jpg

It seems impossible to believe, but astronomers are now making plans to reach for the brass ring of planet hunting: to find Earth-sized worlds orbiting other stars, and then to analyze them to see if there’s life. But you’ve got to know what you’re looking for. That’s why astronomers are considering what the Earth might look like from afar. What clues would our planet give to distant astronomers that there’s life here?

The number of discovered planets is up to 240 now and growing. In fact, the planetary discoveries are coming so fast and furious that many universities don’t even bother releasing press releases any more.

But these are all hostile worlds; larger than our own gas giants, and many orbit tightly to their parent star. We’re not going to find life on these “hot jupiters”. No, it’s going to be the Earth-sized planets, orbiting within the habitable zone of their star, where water can still be a liquid on the surface of the planet. These planets are going to have active weather systems, oceans and land masses.

Even with a telescope with many times the power of the Hubble Space Telescope, an Earth-sized world would appear as a single pixel in a vast empty space. You wouldn’t get any kind of detailed resolution.

Can a single pixel tell you anything about that world? Researchers say, “yes”. In a new paper published in the online edition of the Astrophysical Journal, they say that observers looking at the Earth from afar would be able to judge our rotation rate, the probability of oceans, weather, and even if the planet has life.

If distant astronomers were watching Earth, they’d see the brightness change over time as clouds rotated in and out of view. If they could also measure its rotation period, they’d know whether a certain part of the planet was in view, and start to deduce if there are oceans or land masses pointed towards them.

The researchers have created a computer model for the brightness of Earth over time, showing that the global cloud cover is surprisingly constant. There are usually clouds over the rain forests, and arid regions are clear.

Astronomers watching Earth would start to recognize the patterns, and be able to deduce an active weather system here. Compare this to the other planets in the Solar System:

“Venus is always covered in clouds. The brightness never changes,” said Eric Ford, a UF assistant professor of astronomy, and one of 5 authors on the paper. “Mars has virtually no clouds. Earth, on the other hand, has a lot of variation.”

To recognize these kinds of characteristics on another world will require a telescope with roughly twice the size of Hubble. And observatories like this are in the works.

Original Source: University of Florida News Release

Galaxy Has 1,000 Times Our Rate of Star Formation

2007-1219galaxies.thumbnail.jpg

Here in the Milky Way, new stars are formed at a rate of roughly 4 per year; that’s considered pretty normal for spiral galaxy like ours. But researchers have found a galaxy that’s absolutely bursting with new star formation. Instead of our leisurely 4 stars per year, this distant galaxy is generating more than 4,000 new stars a year.

The galaxy, known at GOODS 850-5, is located about 12 billion light-years from Earth. This means that astronomers are seeing the light coming from it at a point when the Universe was only 1.5 billion years old.

All of the star formation in this galaxy was obscured by thick layers of dust, emitted by all the stellar nurseries. This means they’re hidden by visible-light telescopes.

By using the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory’s Submillimeter Array (SMA) on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, the researchers were able to peer right through the obscuring dust to calculate the rate of star formation.

The irony is that the dust from all that star formation was obscuring the, uh, star formation. Here’s Wei-Hao Wang, one of the astronomers who worked on the research:

“This evidence for prolific star formation is hidden by the dust from visible-light telescopes,” Wang explained. The dust, in turn, was formed from heavy elements that had to be built up in the cores of earlier stars. This indicates, Wang said, that significant numbers of stars already had formed, then spewed those heavy elements into interstellar space through supernova explosions and stellar winds.

This discovery has come as a bit of a surprise, since astronomers used to think that the most actively star forming galaxies would be smaller and less obscured. Now they’re starting to realize that it’s actually the big dusty galaxies that form the most stars. We just couldn’t see it.

For a galaxy to be experiencing this much star formation, it must have gone through many rounds of mergers with other galaxies. And this is also surprising, considering it’s only 1.5 billion years old in the image.

Original Source: NRAO News Release

Astrosphere for December 19th, 2007

2007-1219mars.thumbnail.jpg

For your photo today, it’s another image of Mars nearing its closest point to the Earth. This one was captured by Efrain Morales Riviera in the forum.

Astronomy in the UK is in deep trouble. The Science & Technology Facilities Council has had their budget slashed by £80 million. Find out more and help out here.

Centauri Dreams has more details about the Tunguska research I reported on today. And so does Bad Astronomy.

Here’s a great idea: a space exploration reality show, with a group of potential explorers cooped up together on a mock spaceship here on Earth. Okay, maybe it’s a terrible idea.

Maybe off-world children will wear gravity suits in the future to simulate living on Earth.

On an administrative note, Pamela and I will be attending the American Astronomical Society meeting in Austin, TX in January. If you’re going drop me a note. We’re going to try and organize some kind of meetup for Astronomy Cast.

Several people mentioned this great interview with astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson in the Washington Post.

Astronomers Track Flares on a Distant Star

2007-1219flare.thumbnail.jpg

Spotting flares on the surface of the Sun is easy. It’s right there, blazing in our skies. But watching flares erupt on the surface of a distant star, located 150 light-years away… now that’s a challenge. And yet, a team of European astronomers announce just such a discovery this week.

This accomplishment was made by a team of astronomers using the European Southern Observatory’s Very Large Telescope and ESA’s XMM-Newton X-ray satellite.

The astronomers were watching the star BO Microscopii, nicknamed “Speedy Mic” because of its rapid rotation. The star is slightly smaller than the Sun, and located about 10 million times as far away.

According to the press release, imaging the surface is crazy hard:

Trying to see spots on its surface is as challenging as trying to directly obtain a photograph of the footsteps of Neil Armstrong on the Moon, and be able to see details in it. This is impossible to achieve even with the best telescopes: to obtain an image with such amount of details, you would need a telescope with a 400 km wide mirror!

So how did they do it? They used a technique called “Doppler imaging”, which measures slight changes in the star’s light as it rotates. These changes can be mapped into spots and flares on the star’s surface as it turns.

Over the course of 142 separate observations, the team identified several flares. One flare lasted 4 hours long, and would have generated about a hundred times as much energy as the flares we see on the Sun.

Since BO Microscopii is much younger than the Sun, only 30 million years young, it can give us valuable clues about our star’s early history. Perhaps the early Sun was this active, and then settled down in later life.

Original Source: ESO News Release