Author: Fraser Cain

Artist illustraton of a black hole consuming a neutron star. Image credit: Dana Berry/NASA. Click to enlarge.
Scientists have solved a 35-year-old mystery of the origin of powerful, split-second flashes of light called short gamma-ray bursts. These flashes, brighter than a billion suns yet lasting only a few milliseconds, have been simply too fast to catch… until now.

If you guessed that a black hole is involved, you are at least half right. Short gamma-ray bursts arise from collisions between a black hole and a neutron star or between two neutron stars. In the first scenario, the black hole gulps down the neutron star and grows bigger. In the second scenario, the two neutron stars create a black hole.

Gamma-ray bursts, the most powerful explosions known, were first detected in the late 1960s. They are random, fleeting, and can occur from any region of the sky. Try finding the location of a camera flash somewhere in a vast sports stadium and you’ll have a sense of the challenge facing gamma-ray burst hunters. Solving this mystery took unprecedented coordination among scientists using a multitude of ground-based telescopes and NASA satellites.

Two years ago scientists discovered that longer bursts, lasting over two seconds, arise from the explosion of very massive stars. About 30 percent of bursts, however, are short and under two seconds.

Four short gamma-ray bursts have been detected since May. Two of these are featured in four papers in the October 6 issue of Nature. One burst from July provides the “smoking gun” evidence to support the collision theory. Another burst goes a step further by providing tantalizing, first-time evidence of a black hole eating a neutron star—first stretching the neutron star into a crescent, swallowing it, and then gulping up crumbs of the broken star in the minutes and hours that followed.

These discoveries might also aid in the direct detection of gravitational waves, never before seen. Such mergers create gravitational waves, or ripples in spacetime. Short gamma-ray bursts could tell scientists when and where to look for the ripples.

“Gamma-ray bursts in general are notoriously difficult to study, but the shortest ones have been next to impossible to pin down,” said Dr. Neil Gehrels of NASA Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., principal investigator of NASA’s Swift satellite and lead author on one of the Nature reports. “All that has changed. We now have the tools in place to study these events.”

The Swift satellite detected a short burst on May 9, and NASA’s High-Energy Transient Explorer (HETE) detected another on July 9. These are the two bursts featured in Nature. Swift and HETE quickly and autonomously relayed the burst coordinates to scientists and observatories via cell phone, beepers and e-mail.

The May 9 event marked the first time scientists identified an afterglow for a short gamma-ray burst, something commonly seen after long bursts. That discovery was the subject of a May 11 NASA press release. The new results published in Nature represent thorough analyses of these two burst afterglows, which clinch the case for the origin of short bursts.

“We had a hunch that short gamma-ray bursts came from a neutron star crashing into a black hole or another neutron star, but these new detections leave no doubt,” said Dr. Derek Fox of Penn State, lead author on one Nature report detailing a multi-wavelength observation.

Fox’s team discovered the X-ray afterglow of the July 9 burst with NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory. A team led by Prof. Jens Hjorth of the University of Copenhagen then identified the optical afterglow using the Danish 1.5-meter telescope at the La Silla Observatory in Chile. Fox’s team then continued its studies of the afterglow with NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope; the du Pont and Swope telescopes at Las Campanas, Chile, funded by the Carnegie Institution; the Subaru telescope on Mauna Kea, Hawaii, operated by the National Astronomical Observatory of Japan; and the Very Large Array, a stretch of 27 radio telescopes near Socorro, N.M., operated by the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

The multi-wavelength observation of the July 9 burst, called GRB 050709, provided all the pieces of the puzzle to solve the short burst mystery.

“Powerful telescopes detected no supernova as the gamma-ray burst faded, arguing against the explosion of a massive star,” said Dr. George Ricker of MIT, HETE Principal Investigator and co-author of another Nature article. “The July 9 burst was like the dog that didn’t bark.”

Ricker added that the July 9 burst and probably the May 9 burst are located in the outskirts of their host galaxies, where old merging binaries are expected to be. Short gamma-ray bursts are not expected in young, star-forming galaxies. It takes billions of years for two massive stars, coupled in a binary system, to first evolve to the black hole or neutron star phase and then to merge. The transition of a star to a black hole or neutron star involves an explosion (supernova) that can kick the binary system far from its origin and out towards the edge of its host galaxy.

This July 9 burst and a later one on July 24 showed unique signals that point to not just any old merger but, more specifically, a black hole – neutron star merger. Scientists saw spikes of X-ray light after the initial gamma-ray burst. The quick gamma-ray portion is likely a signal of the black hole swallowing most of the neutron star. The X-ray signals, in the minutes to hours that followed, could be crumbs of neutron star material falling into the black hole, a bit like dessert.

And there’s more. Mergers create gravitational waves, ripples in spacetime predicted by Einstein but never detected directly. The July 9 burst was about two billion light years away. A big merger closer to the Earth could be detected by the National Science Foundation’s Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO). If Swift detects a nearby short burst, LIGO scientists could go back and check the data with a precise time and location in mind.

“This is good news for LIGO,” said Dr. Albert Lazzarini, of LIGO Laboratory at Caltech. “The connection between short bursts and mergers firms up projected rates for LIGO, and they appear to be at the high end of previous estimates. Also, observations provide tantalizing hints of black hole – neutron star mergers, which have not been detected before. During LIGO’s upcoming yearlong observation we may detect gravitational waves from such an event.”

A black hole – neutron star merger would generate stronger gravitational waves than two merging neutron stars. The question now is how common and how close these mergers are. Swift, launched in November 2004, can provide that answer.

Original Source: NASA News Release

Mysterious dust cloud in various wavelengths. Image credit: CfA. Click to enlarge.
In an exercise that demonstrates the power of a multiwavelength investigation using diverse facilities, astronomers at the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) have deciphered the true nature of a mysterious object hiding inside a dark cosmic cloud. They found that the cloud, once thought to be featureless, contains a baby star, or possibly a failed star known as a “brown dwarf,” that is still forming within its dusty cocoon.

Observations indicate that the mystery object has a mass about 25 times that of Jupiter, which would place it squarely in the realm of brown dwarfs. However, its mass may eventually grow large enough to qualify it as a small star. The object also is cool and faint, shining with less than 1/20 the sun’s luminosity.

“This object is the runt of the star formation family,” said CfA astronomer Tyler Bourke.

Establishing the true nature of the object required the unique capabilities of the Submillimeter Array (SMA) in Hawaii. “The SMA spotted what no single-dish telescope could see,” said Bourke.

Using the SMA, scientists detected a weak outflow of material predicted by star formation theories. That outflow – 10 times smaller in mass than any seen before – confirmed both the low-mass nature of the object and its association with the surrounding dark cloud. “The sensitivity and resolution of the Submillimeter Array with its multiple antennas were crucial in detecting the outflow,” said Bourke.

The puzzling object was discovered using a Smithsonian-developed infrared camera on board NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope. Spitzer studied the dusty cosmic cloud named L1014 as part of the Cores to Disks Legacy program. A core is the densest region of a cloud, massive enough to make a star like the sun.

L1014, located about 600 light-years away in the constellation Cygnus the Swan, initially was classified as a “starless core” because it showed no evidence for star formation. Astronomers were surprised when Spitzer images revealed a faint infrared light source that appeared to be within the core.

Additional data were needed to confirm that the faint object was directly associated with the dark core, rather than being a chance superposition of a more distant, more mundane background object.

Near-infrared observations by the MMT Observatory in Arizona revealed a scattered light nebula surrounding the faint central object in L1014. “Light from the object is bouncing off surrounding dust and toward us,” said CfA astronomer Tracy Huard, who took the MMT images. “Reflection nebulosity like that is a fingerprint of an embedded object.”

The apparent size of the nebulosity indicated that the light source likely was located within L1014 and not in a more distant cloud. MMT data also gave investigators the orientation in space, or tilt, of the object within L1014. Astronomers then turned to the SMA for final confirmation.

“The Spitzer observations gave us hints to the nature of the object inside L1014. The MMT strengthened the association between the infrared source and the starless core. The Submillimeter Array clinched the case and revealed this object’s true identity,” said Bourke.

By studying faint, young objects like the one still forming within L1014, astronomers hope to learn more about the early stages of star formation.

“The most elusive part of star formation is the moment of birth,” said CfA astronomer Phil Myers. “In order to answer how it happens, you need examples of very young systems. This system is only about 10,000 to 100,000 years old – a baby as far as stars or brown dwarfs go.”

The combined capabilities of Spitzer, the SMA and the MMT were essential for finding and examining this object. Those facilities undoubtedly will prove useful in studying similar very dim, very young objects – objects so young that they are still growing. “They’re so young and faint that we can’t tell how much mass they will accumulate,” Myers added. “There’s no prenatal test for these objects. We’re not sure exactly what we’ll get in the end!”

A paper by Tyler L. Bourke et al. covering the SMA observations will be published in an upcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters and is available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509865.

A second paper by Tracy L. Huard et al. covering the MMT observations will be published in The Astrophysical Journal and is available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0509302.

Headquartered in Cambridge, Mass., the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics (CfA) is a joint collaboration between the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory and the Harvard College Observatory. CfA scientists, organized into six research divisions, study the origin, evolution and ultimate fate of the universe.

Original Source: CfA News Release

Artist illustration of the 10th planet and its moon. Image credit: Caltech. Click to enlarge.
The newly discovered 10th planet, 2003 UB313, is looking more and more like one of the solar system’s major players. It has the heft of a real planet (latest estimates put it at about 20 percent larger than Pluto), a catchy code name (Xena, after the TV warrior princess), and a Guinness Book-ish record of its own (at about 97 astronomical units-or 9 billion miles from the sun-it is the solar system’s farthest detected object). And, astronomers from the California Institute of Technology and their colleagues have now discovered, it has a moon.

The moon, 100 times fainter than Xena and orbiting the planet once every couple of weeks, was spotted on September 10, 2005, with the 10-meter Keck II telescope at the W.M. Keck Observatory in Hawaii by Michael E. Brown, professor of planetary astronomy, and his colleagues at Caltech, the Keck Observatory, Yale University, and the Gemini Observatory in Hawaii. The research was partly funded by NASA. A paper about the discovery was submitted on October 3 to Astrophysical Journal Letters.

“Since the day we discovered Xena, the big question has been whether or not it has a moon,” says Brown. “Having a moon is just inherently cool-and it is something that most self-respecting planets have, so it is good to see that this one does too.”

Brown estimates that the moon, nicknamed “Gabrielle”-after the fictional Xena’s fictional sidekick-is at least one-tenth of the size of Xena, which is thought to be about 2700 km in diameter (Pluto is 2274 km), and may be around 250 km across.

To know Gabrielle’s size more precisely, the researchers need to know the moon’s composition, which has not yet been determined. Most objects in the Kuiper Belt, the massive swath of miniplanets that stretches from beyond Neptune out into the distant fringes of the solar system, are about half rock and half water ice. Since a half-rock, half-ice surface reflects a fairly predictable amount of sunlight, a general estimate of the size of an object with that composition can be made. Very icy objects, however, reflect a lot more light, and so will appear brighter-and thus bigger-than similarly sized rocky objects.

Further observations of the moon with NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope, planned for November and December, will allow Brown and his colleagues to pin down Gabrielle’s exact orbit around Xena. With that data, they will be able to calculate Xena’s mass, using a formula first devised some 300 years ago by Isaac Newton.

“A combination of the distance of the moon from the planet and the speed it goes around the planet tells you very precisely what the mass of the planet is,” explains Brown. “If the planet is very massive, the moon will go around very fast; if it is less massive, the moon will travel more slowly. It is the only way we could ever measure the mass of Xena-because it has a moon.”

The researchers discovered Gabrielle using Keck II’s recently commissioned Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics system. Adaptive optics is a technique that removes the blurring of atmospheric turbulence, creating images as sharp as would be obtained from space-based telescopes. The new laser guide star system allows researchers to create an artificial “star” by bouncing a laser beam off a layer of the atmosphere about 75 miles above the ground. Bright stars located near the object of interest are used as the reference point for the adaptive optics corrections. Since no bright stars are naturally found near Xena, adaptive optics imaging would have been impossible without the laser system.

“With Laser Guide Star Adaptive Optics, observers not only get more resolution, but the light from distant objects is concentrated over a much smaller area of the sky, making faint detections possible,” says Marcos van Dam, adaptive optics scientist at the W.M. Keck Observatory, and second author on the new paper.

The new system also allowed Brown and his colleagues to observe a small moon in January around 2003 EL61, code-named “Santa,” another large new Kuiper Belt object. No moon was spotted around 2005 FY9-or “Easterbunny”-the third of the three big Kuiper Belt objects recently discovered by Brown and his colleagues using the 48-inch Samuel Oschin Telescope at Palomar Observatory. But the presence of moons around three of the Kuiper Belt’s four largest objects-Xena, Santa, and Pluto-challenges conventional ideas about how worlds in this region of the solar system acquire satellites.

Previously, researchers believed that Kuiper Belt objects obtained moons through a process called gravitational capture, in which two formerly separate objects moved too close to one another and become entrapped in each other’s gravitational embrace. This was thought to be true of the Kuiper Belt’s small denizens-but not, however, of Pluto. Pluto’s massive, closely orbiting moon, Charon, broke off the planet billions of years ago, after it was smashed by another Kuiper Belt object. Xena’s and Santa’s moons appear best explained by a similar origin.

“Pluto once seemed a unique oddball at the fringe of the solar system,” Brown says. “But we now see that Xena, Pluto, and the others are part of a diverse family of large objects with similar characteristics, histories, and even moons, which together will teach us much more about the solar system than any single oddball ever would.”

Original Source: Caltech News Release