Author: Nancy Atkinson

Worried about how you’re going to feed your black hole once it grows up and gets big? Have no fear. New data from the Chandra X-ray Observatory indicates that even the biggest black holes may feed just like the smallest ones. Using new observations and a detailed theoretical model, a research team compared the properties of the black hole of the spiral galaxy M81 with those of smaller, stellar mass black holes. The results show that big or little, black holes appear to eat similarly to each other, and produce a similar distribution of X-rays, optical and radio light. This discovery supports the implication of Einstein’s relativity theory that black holes of all sizes have similar properties.

M81 is about 12 million light years from Earth. In the center of M81 is a black hole that is about 70 million times more massive than the Sun, and generates energy and radiation as it pulls gas in the central region of the galaxy inwards at high speed.

In contrast, so-called stellar mass black holes, which have about 10 times more mass than the Sun, have a different source of food. These smaller black holes acquire new material by pulling gas from an orbiting companion star. Because the bigger and smaller black holes are found in different environments with different sources of material to feed from, a question has remained about whether they feed in the same way.

“When we look at the data, it turns out that our model works just as well for the giant black hole in M81 as it does for the smaller guys,” said Michael Nowak, from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. “Everything around this huge black hole looks just the same except it’s almost 10 million times bigger.”

One of the implications of Einstein’s theory of General Relativity is that black holes are simple objects and only their masses and spins determine their effect on space-time. The latest research indicates that this simplicity manifests itself in spite of complicated environmental effects.

The model that Markoff and her colleagues used to study the black holes includes a faint disk of material spinning around the black hole. This structure would mainly produce X-rays and optical light. A region of hot gas around the black hole would be seen largely in ultraviolet and X-ray light. A large contribution to both the radio and X-ray light comes from jets generated by the black hole. Multi-wavelength data is needed to disentangle these overlapping sources of light.

Among actively feeding black holes the one in M81 is one of the dimmest, presumably because it is “underfed”. It is, however, one of the brightest as seen from Earth because of its relative proximity, allowing high quality observations to be made.

“It seems like the underfed black holes are the simplest in practice, perhaps because we can see closer to the black hole,” said Andrew Young of the University of Bristol in England. “They don’t seem to care too much where they get their food from.”
This work should be useful for predicting the properties of a third, unconfirmed class called intermediate mass black holes, with masses lying between those of stellar and supermassive black holes. Some possible members of this class have been identified, but the evidence is controversial, so specific predictions for the properties of these black holes should be very helpful.

In addition to Chandra, three radio arrays (the Giant Meterwave Radio Telescope, the Very Large Array and the Very Long Baseline Array), two millimeter telescopes (the Plateau de Bure Interferometer and the Submillimeter Array), and Lick Observatory in the optical were used to monitor M81.
The results of this study will appear in an upcoming issue of The Astrophysical Journal.

News Source: NASA’s Chandra Website

Have you ever been surprised at your annual weigh-in at the doctor’s office to find that your bathroom scale at home was wrong? Or, bought a new scale that had a difference of opinion with your old one? That’s what has happened with our very own Galaxy, the Milky Way. “The Galaxy is slimmer than we thought,” said Xiangxiang Xue of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy in Germany and the National Astronomical Observatories of China, who lead a research team using the Sloan Digital Survey to measure the mass of the stars in the galaxy. “We were quite surprised by this result,” said Donald Schneider, a member of the research team, from Penn State. The researchers explained that it wasn’t a Galactic diet that accounted for the galaxy’s recent slimming, but a more accurate scale.

The researchers used the motions of distant stars to make the new determination of the Milky Way’s mass. They measured the motions of 2,400 “blue horizontal branch” stars in the extended stellar halo that surrounds the disk of the galaxy. These measurements reach distances of nearly 200,000 light years from the Galactic center, roughly the edge of the region illustrated in the image above. Our Sun lies about 25,000 light years from the center of the Galaxy, roughly halfway out in the Galactic disk. From the speeds of these stars, the researchers were able to estimate much better the mass of the Milky Way’s dark-matter halo, which they found to be much ‘slimmer’ than thought before.

The discovery is based on data from the project known as SEGUE (Sloan Extension for Galactic Understanding and Exploration), an enormous survey of stars in the Milky Way. Using SEGUE measurements of stellar velocities in the outer Milky Way, a region known as the stellar halo, the researchers determined the mass of the Galaxy by inferring the amount of gravity required to keep the stars in orbit. Some of that gravity comes from the Milky Way stars themselves, but most of it comes the distribution of invisible dark matter, which is still not fully understood.

The most recent previous studies of the mass of the Milky Way used mixed samples of 50 to 500 objects. They implied masses up to two-trillion times the mass of the Sun for the total mass of the Galaxy. By contrast, when the SDSS-II measurement within 180,000 light years is corrected to a total-mass measurement, it yields a value slightly under one-trillion times the mass of the Sun.

“The enormous size of SEGUE gives us a huge statistical advantage,” said Hans-Walter Rix, director of the Max Planck Institute for Astronomy. “We can select a uniform set of tracers, and the large sample of stars allows us to calibrate our method against realistic computer simulations of the Galaxy.” Another collaborator, Timothy Beers of Michigan State University, explained, “The total mass of the Galaxy is hard to measure because we’re stuck in the middle of it. But it is the single most fundamental number we have to know if we want to understand how the Milky Way formed or to compare it to distant galaxies that we see from the outside.”

All SDSS-II observations are made from the 2.5-meter telescope at Apache Point Observatory in New Mexico. The telescope uses a mosaic digital camera to image large areas of sky and spectrographs fed by 640 optical fibers to measure light from individual stars, galaxies, and quasars. SEGUE’s stellar spectra turn flat sky maps into multi-dimensional views of the Milky Way, Beers said, by providing distances, velocities, and chemical compositions of hundreds of thousands of stars.

Source: Penn State, arXiv