Crew of Six Begins 105-day Mars Mission Simulation

The Mars 500 simulation participants enter their new home. Image Credit: ESA

[/caption]

Earlier today in Moscow, six people were locked inside a hermetically sealed living space, where they will remain for the next 105 days. They will eat dehydrated food, have limited contact with the outside world and will be constantly monitored. No, it’s not another season of ‘Big Brother’, but a joint experiment by the European Space Agency and the Institute for Biomedical Problems (IBMP) of the Russian Academy of Sciences to study the effects a mission to Mars would have on a human crew.

The crew consists of six volunteers, two selected by the ESA and four by the Russian Academy of Sciences. Oliver Knickel, a 34-year old German engineer, and Cyrille Fournier, a 40-year old French airline pilot will represent the ESA. The four Russian crew members are Oleg Artemyez, a 37-year old cosmonaut, Sergei Ryazansky a 34-year old cosmonaut and biologist, Alexei Baranov a 34-year old doctor, and Alexei Shpakov, 25, who is a sports physiologist.

These six, along with two alternate candidates willing to step in at the last minute, were chosen from over 5600 applicants for the first stage in the Mars 500 isolation study. The crew will live in a small, cramped module designed to simulate a potential craft that would send astronauts to Mars. The Mars mission mock-up is located inside a research facility at the Institute of Biomedical Problems in Moscow.

The 105-day study will simulate all aspects of a mission to Mars. The crew will have no communication with the outside world besides delayed radio communication with mission control, and radio contact with friends and family, much like that of astronauts aboard the International Space Station. Simulated emergencies such as equipment failure will test the ability of the crew to overcome difficulties that may endanger an actual mission, and there is the danger of real emergencies from disease or injury inside their sealed facility.

The crew will be far from bored during the simulation, as they will perform scientific, maintenance and quotidian duties much as they would on a real mission. A greenhouse will also need tending to provide the crew with fresh vegetables, and there will be a gym available to the participants to help keep them fit. Instructions from the mission directors and reports from the crew will be on a 20-minute delay, as would be the case on a real Mars mission.

The habitable area of the isolation facility has 6 individual rooms for the participants, a kitchen/dining room, living room, main control room and toilet. In addition to the habitable module, there is also a Mars lander module, which the crew during the longer 500-day mission scheduled for later this year will use to simulate a landing on Mars. A medical module and utility module will house other equipment necessary for such a long-term mission.

An external view of the Module for Mars 500 Image Credit: ESA
An external view of the Module for Mars 500 Image Credit: ESA

A potential manned mission to Mars would pose many challenges to the astronauts involved, and the Mars 500 series of isolation studies hopes to try and work out any ‘kinks’ while humans are still safely on the planet.

“It is of paramount importance to understand the psychological and physiological effects of long-duration confinement, to be able to prepare the crews in the best way possible and to learn about important aspects of the vehicle design. To contribute to their psychological well-being and long-term performance, we need to learn how to support the crew with optimum nutrition, artificial light, appropriate medical countermeasures and also planned and off-nominal task management.” – Martin Zell, Head of the ISS Utilisation Department in ESA’s Directorate of Human Spaceflight

ESA crewmembers Cyrille Fournier and Oliver Knickel will keep a diary of their experience, which will be available on the European Space Agency site here.

Fournier wrote in anticipation of the program, “During the study I look forward to observing how communications develop and how relationships are established between crew members. I expect that each of us will feel both highs and lows, mentally, physically and socially. I am however optimistic about how the experiment will turn out as I strongly believe the group, as a whole, will be able to overcome momentary and personal downs.”

As always, we’ll keep you posted here on Universe Today as to how the simulation goes.

Source: ESA

How Many Planets are in the Milky Way?

Artist's impression of a transiting exoplanet (ESA - C.Carreau)

[/caption]

How many are in the Milky Way, though? There could be billions, many of them habitable and Earth-like, according to some astronomers. Our ability to detect planets orbiting other stars has been around for less than 20 years, and most of the planets discovered to date are much larger than Jupiter (in fact, extrasolar planets are commonly measured in “Jupiter masses”.)

There are a few different methods for detecting exoplanets. The primary techniques are astrometry and radial velocity measurements. Astrometry is basically measuring the gravitational influence of a planet as it orbits its star. How much it pulls the star side to side can give a lot of information as to the amount of mass the planet has. Measuring radial velocity is much like astrometry, only with this method the amount the star moves toward and away from the Earth is measured by observing the Doppler shift of the light coming from the star.

Another technique is called the transit method. As a planet orbits in front of its star, the light coming from the star is dimmed, and by observing the star for long periods of time, and taking the spectrum of the light both when the planet is in front of the star and behind, much can be known about the makeup of the planet’s atmosphere (if there is any). The transit method is often used in combination with astrometry and radial velocity measurements to estimate the mass of the planet.

Other methods for detecting planets are explained on the European Space Agency’s website and Curious About Astronomy. If you want a complete list of all planets detected so far, NASA’s PlanetQuest site is a great place to start, as well as The Extrasolar Planets Encyclopaedia.

Direct imaging of extrasolar planets is very difficult, as the overwhelming amount of light coming from the star a planet is orbiting completely washes it out. However, Hubble has imaged the planet Fomalhault b, and the system HR8799, which consists of three planets, was imaged using the Keck and Gemini telescopes.

There are currently a number of NASA missions working on the discovery of extrasolar planets, including Hubble, and the Spitzer Space Telescope. The Kepler mission, launched on March 6th of 2009, will monitor a section of the sky containing over 100,000 stars and use the methods described above in an effort to detect an exoplanets in that region. The Terrestrial Planet Finder mission is another mission to study all aspects of extrasolar planets in rather great detail, though it is still in the concept phase as of this writing.

Exoplanets were discussed on Astronomy Cast in  Episode 34: Discovering Another Earth and Episode 125: A Zoo of Extrasolar Planets.

Source: NASA

The Milky Way Spiral

Artist impression of the Milky Way.

[/caption]

If you’ve seen an image of the Milky Way from above or below, you will certainly notice that it has a spiral structure. Not all galaxies are created equal, though, as there are many, known as elliptical galaxies, that are blob-like, while others have irregular shapes. Ours is of a class of galaxies called barred spirals, because it has a rectangular bar in the middle of the galactic disk.

The Milky Way has four main spiral arms: the Norma and Cygnus arm, Sagittarius, Scutum-Crux, and Perseus. The Sun is located in a minor arm, or spur, named the Orion Spur. The galactic disk itself is about 100,000 light years across, and the bar at the center is estimated to be about 27,000 light years long.

Why is the Milky Way a spiral? This is due to its rotation, or rather, the rotation of matter inside the galactic disk around the center. It’s not as if the stars themselves stay in the spiral arms, and rotate around the center of the galaxy, though: if they did this, the arms would wind in tighter and tighter over time (2 billion years or so), since the stars in the center revolve faster than those further out.

The spirals are actually what is called a density wave or standing wave. The best way to describe this is the analogy of a traffic jam: cars travel on a busy road in a city, bunching up in jams over the course of a day at certain sections. But the cars move through the jam eventually, and other cars pile up behind them in the jam. The wave is at a certain location, with bunches of matter piling up there for a while, then moving on to be replaced by other matter. As dust and gas is compressed in the spirals, it is heated up and results in the formation of new stars. This star formation makes the trailing edge of the spiral brighter, and places the density wave “ahead”, where dimmer, redder stars are starting to be compressed.

When you see an image of the Milky Way like the one above, it’s not actually a photo of our galaxy. Since we inhabit the disk and have no way (currently) of going above or below, images of the Milky Way are generated by computers or artists. Astronomers have determined that the Milky Way is a spiral galaxy by mapping the movements of stars and hydrogen clouds in the disk.

The Milky Way is far from being the only spiral galaxy in the Universe. To view images of other spiral galaxies, go to the aptly-named Spiral Galaxies website, or NASA’s Astronomy Picture of the Day Spiral Galaxy Index.

To learn more about the Milky Way, check out Episode 99 of Astronomy Cast, or visit the rest of the Milky Way section in the Guide to Space.

Source: University of Wisconsin-Madison News

The Milky Way Could have Billions of Earths

Exoplanets like the Earth might be more common than we think. Image Credit: ESO

With the upcoming launch in March of the Kepler mission to find extrasolar planets, there is quite a lot of buzz about the possibility of finding habitable planets outside of our Solar System. Kepler will be the first satellite telescope with the capability to find Earth-size and smaller planets. At the most recent meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) in Chicago, Dr. Alan Boss is quoted by numerous media outlets as saying that there could be billions of Earth-like planets in the Milky Way alone, and that we may find an Earth-like planet orbiting a large proportion of the stars in the Universe.

“There are something like a few dozen solar-type stars within something like 30 light years of the sun, and I would think that a good number of those — perhaps half of them would have Earth-like planets. So, I think there’s a very good chance that we’ll find some Earth-like planets within 10, 20, or 30 light years of the Sun,” Dr. Boss said in an AAAS podcast interview.

Dr. Boss is an astronomer at the Carnegie Institution of Washington Department of Terrestrial Magnetism, and is the author of The Crowded Universe, a book on the likelihood of finding life and habitable planets outside of our Solar System.

“Not only are they probably habitable but they probably are also going to be inhabited. But I think that most likely the nearby ‘Earths’ are going to be inhabited with things which are perhaps more common to what Earth was like three or four billion years ago,” Dr. Boss told the BBC. In other words, it’s more likely that bacteria-like lifeforms abound, rather than more advanced alien life.

This sort of postulation about the existence of extraterrestrial life (and intelligence) falls under the paradigm of the Drake Equation, named after the astronomer Frank Drake. The Drake Equation incorporates all of the variables one should take into account when trying to calculate the number of technologically advanced civilizations elsewhere in the Universe. Depending on what numbers you put into the equation, the answer ranges from zero to trillions. There is wide speculation about the existence of life elsewhere in the Universe.

To date, the closest thing to an Earth-sized planet discovered outside of our Solar System is CoRoT-Exo-7b, with a diameter of less than twice that of the Earth.

The speculation by Dr. Boss and others will be put to the test later this year when the Kepler satellite gets up and running. Set to launch on March 9th, 2009, the Kepler mission will utilize a 0.95 meter telescope to view one section of the sky containing over 100,000 stars for the entirety of the mission, which will last at least 3.5 years.

The prospect of life existing elsewhere is exciting, to be sure, and we’ll be keeping you posted here on Universe Today when any of the potentially billions of Earth-like planets are discovered!

Source: BBC, EurekAlert

The Switch to Digital Switches off Big Bang TV Signal

The switch to digital will eliminate the Big Bang channel.

[/caption]

The switch from analog to digital television broadcasting signals in the United States , which was originally scheduled for February 17th, has been postponed until June 12th, 2009. To those anticipating the higher-quality picture and more reliable signal that this switch will afford, the delay is surely a downer, though some stations may begin broadcasting digital signals before this date. You may be surprised, though, that the change in signal may no longer allow you to see leftover radiation from the Big Bang in the static on your television screen.

That’s right – when you are between channels on an analog television, the snow that you see on the screen is made up of interference from background signals that the antenna on your TV is picking up. Some of the “snow” is from other transmissions here on Earth, and some is from other radio emissions from space. Part of that interference – about 1% or less – comes from background radiation leftover from the Big Bang, called the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). The same is true for FM radios – when the radio is tuned to a frequency that is between stations, part of the hiss that you hear, called “white noise”, is leftover radiation from  the Big Bang some 13.7 billion years ago.

In other words, your TV and radio are telescopes, good for receiving transmissions here on Earth, but really, really bad telescopes for viewing the Universe (a 1:100 signal-to-noise ratio is pretty poor). Why does your TV or radio allow you to tune into the Big Bang, however poorly? Analog television signals are basically radio waves that your television picks up, decodes, and turns into an image on your television using what’s called a cathode ray tube (CRT) in older televisions, and in newer TVs, plasma displays.

These analog signals are broadcast between 7-1002 Mhz, and TV tuners are designed to receive in this range. The CMB peaks in the microwave, at around 160 Ghz, but the frequency of CMB photons can be lower than 100 Mhz (.1 Ghz). Your television antenna is constantly being bombarded by these signals, but when it’s tuned to a specific station the overwhelming intensity of the signal at that frequency makes a crisp picture on your screen, and drowns out everything else. When your TV or radio isn’t tuned into a channel that is brodcasting clearly, it picks up whatever radio transmissions are available and displays those transmissions as the black and white static that is oh-so annoying when you are trying to acrobatically align your TV antenna and stand in just the right place to clearly show your favorite program. Here’s a short clip from First Science explaining the CMB and white noise.

Digital signals eliminate the interference while watching a program because instead of broadcasting the picture as a radio wave which communicates to the CRT or plasma screen what to “paint” on the screen by the frequency of the signal, all a digital signal communicates is a 1 or 0, and the digital converter takes care of decoding and sending information as to what the picture and sound on your screen should look like.

In fact, it was annoying “noise” that led to the discovery of the Cosmic Microwave Background in the first place.  In 1965, Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson had built a Dicke radiometer for Bell Telephone Laboratories to use in radio astronomy and satellite communication experiments. Their instrument kept receiving a background signal that they could not account for. After trying everything imaginable to eliminate the noise (including removing the pigeon droppings from the telescope), they finally realized that the signal wasn’t “noise”, but photons from the Big Bang. Penzias and Wilson share the 1978 Nobel Prize in physics for this discovery, and the CMB has since been studied as a way to learn more about the beginnings of the Universe.

Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson in front of the Horn Antenna. Image Credit: AIP Niels Bohr Library
Arno Penzias and Robert Wilson in front of the Horn Antenna. Image Credit: AIP Niels Bohr Library

Televisions manufactured after March 1, 2007 for the U.S. are required to have Digital Television (DTV) tuners or be DTV ready. Some broadcasters are already transmitting TV programs in both analog and digital formats, but they will all be required to broadcast only in digital format after June 12, 2009. If you have an older television that doesn’t contain a built-in DTV tuner, you will have to buy a digital converter box. So, if you want to see static created by the CMB, unplugging the converter after June 12th will suffice. If you have a newer TV that only has a digital tuner, you will sadly be unable to experience that small percentage of influence the ancient event of the Big Bang has on something quotidian as the television in your living room.

Source: Science Talk (Scientific American) ,How Television Works

The Size of the Milky Way

Milky Way. Image Credit: Atlas of the Universe

[/caption]

When you look up into the night sky on a clear night in a place that has little light pollution, you can see thousands of stars spanning the sky, all of which lie in our galaxy, the Milky Way. The Milky Way seems really, really big when seen from the comparatively tiny Earth. What follows is a list of the attributes of our galactic neighborhood, the dimensions of our corner of space.

We’ll start with the mass of the Milky Way. It’s so massive that we have to give its mass in units of something rather large itself: the Sun. When you take into account all of the stars, gas, dust and the copious amounts of dark matter that surround our galaxy in a halo, it has about 3 trillion times the mass of the Sun, according to the most recent estimate as of this writing. Previous estimates put the number at over 1 trillion solar masses. Over 90% of that mass can be attributed to dark matter, matter that cannot be detected except for its gravitational pull.

Of course, the Milky Way isn’t all dark matter – there’s lots of gas, dust, and stars that populate the galactic disk. The number of stars in the Milky Way is estimated to be about 200-400 billion, though you can only see about 5,000-8,000 of those stars with the naked eye, and only about 2,500 of them at any one time from the Earth. For one of the most highly detailed images of our galaxy in all of its stars and splendor from the Spitzer Space Telescope, go here.

The Milky Way is a huge disk, roughly 100,000 to 120,000 light years across. Its thickness is 1,000 light years throughout most of the disk, but there is a spheroidal bulge at the center of the galaxy that is 12,000 light years in diameter. These proportions are similar to a small stack of DVDs with a rubber ball glued into the middle. For a great representation of the proportions of the Milky Way in these terms, check out the video Galaxies by the Bad Astronomer, Phil Plait.

If you want to get more details about the size of the Milky Way, check out the rest of our section on the Guide to Space and listen to Episode 99 of Astronomy Cast.

Source: NASA

The Milky Way from Earth

The Milky Way from Earth. Image Credit: Kerry-Ann Lecky Hepburn (Weather and Sky Photography)

[/caption]

If you look up into the night sky on a very clear night, in an area with very little light pollution, you will see a band of stars splashed across the sky. That band is the Milky Way, the spiral galaxy in which our Solar System lies, and where almost every object you can see with your naked eye calls home.

The Solar System is inside the disk of the Milky Way, and orbits in one of the spiral arms at 26,000 light years from the center of the galaxy. We can’t see the spiral structure of the galaxy from our planet because we are inside the disk and have no means of taking images from above or below the galaxy. Images of the Milky Way’s spiral structure are created from computer modeling based on information from stars as they orbit the galaxy.

Much of the Milky Way is invisible to us because we have to look through the plane of its disk – a lot of the Milky Way is on the other side of the galaxy, and there is so much dust and so many bright stars closer to us that we can’t see the stars behind all of this matter. Of the 5,000 to 8,000 stars in the Milky Way visible to the human eye from Earth, one can usually only see about 2,500 at a time. In fact, the few thousand stars we can see of the Milky Way with our naked eye are only about 0.000003% of the 200-400 billion stars that inhabit the spiral!

To see a picture of the entire Milky Way from the surface of the Earth at once, you have to create a mosaic of photographs taken at different times. This is because the Milky Way moves overhead at night with the rotation of the Earth, so can’t be viewed all at once from one spot. Many panoramas of our galaxy can be found on the web, but here’s a few to get you started:  NASA’s Astronomy Picture of the Day, the Spitzer Space Telescope’s very detailed, very large (55-meters long when printed) mosaic available for your perusal here – it’s a large image, so give it a little time to load – and a drawing by Knut Lundmark of over 7,000 stars in the Milky Way made in the 1950s.

To learn more about the Milky Way, visit the rest of the section here at the Guide to Space, listen to Episode 99 of Astronomy Cast, or visit the Students for the Exploration and Development of Space.

Source: NASA

What is the Milky Way Collision?

An artist’s impression of the collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda from Earth. Credit: James Gitlin/STScI.

Billions of years from now, the Milky Way will look totally different, as pictured to the left. When you look up at the sky, you may see another entire galaxy passing through the plane of our own, creating stars and supernovae and changing the entire sky.

Though most galaxies are rushing away from us as the Universe expands, Andromeda and the Milky Way are orbiting each other and closing in fast. Collisions between galaxies aren’t always catastrophic (the Milky Way is colliding with the Canis Major Dwarf galaxy right now, swallowing its stars up into the galactic disk), but they can trigger star formation on large scales and increase the number of supernovae.

When the galaxies collide, there is little chance that many stars will slam into each other directly because they are so spread out; however, the gas that lies between the stars can collide, heat up and trigger the formation of new stars. This interstellar gas and dust could also get sucked up by existing stars, increasing their mass to the point where they go supernova.

By the time the Milky Way and Andromeda collide, though, much of the gas in both galaxies will have been used up to create stars, so a “starburst” won’t happen. It won’t be a quick merger, though, and the spiral structure of each will be seriously changed. As you can see in this animated simulation from University of Toronto astronomer John Dubinski, the galaxies will pass through each other a few times, and the gravitational disturbance of this passage will throw stars willy-nilly into empty space.

Andromeda and the Milky Way will pass through each other once, then fall apart for about a billion years, then pass again, and again until finally settling down to merge completely about 5 billion years from now. The resulting galaxy won’t look anything like either of the merged galaxies – it will be a fuzzy blob called an elliptical galaxy. “Milkomeda” has a nice ring to it, and is one proposed name for the new merged galaxy.

When the galaxies do finally merge, there is a small chance that the Solar System will either join the Andromeda galaxy for a short while during one of the passes, or that it will be flung out of our galactic disk into interstellar space. For an in-depth analysis of this collision and statistics on the chances of the Sun and planets being ejected, check out “The Collision Between The Milky Way and Andromeda”  by Harvard-Smithsonian astrophysicists T.J. Cox and Abraham Loeb.

Of course, Andromeda is not the only thing that could collide with the Milky Way. There is currently a large cloud of hydrogen gas on a collision course with the Milky Way and though the edge of the cloud is already interacting with our galaxy, it won’t set off star-forming fireworks until at least 40 million years from now. Named Smith’s Cloud after the astronomer who discovered it in 1963, it is 11,000 light-years long and 2,500 light-years wide, and has enough hydrogen to form a million stars the mass of the Sun. More information about this collision can be found right here on Universe Today, and from the National Radio Astronomy Observatory.

Pamela and Fraser talk about what the Milky Way and Andromeda collision will look like in the September 28th, 2008 episode of Astronomy Cast, and the Milky Way in Episode 99.

Source: NASA

The Milky Way and Andromeda

Andromeda Galaxy. Image Credit: NASA

[/caption]

The Andromeda galaxy is the closest spiral galaxy to the Milky Way (though it’s not the closest galaxy). It’s the most distant object you can easily see with the naked eye (under good observing conditions). Andromeda is 220,000 light years in diameter, and is one of the 35 objects that make up what is called the Local Group. Andromeda lies, of course, in Andromeda constellation.

The Andromeda galaxy (also known as  Messier 31, M31, or NGC 224) could be considered the big brother of the Milky Way, as it contains over a trillion stars (compared to our 200-400 billion), and is approximately 220,000 light years across to our 100,000. Andromeda and the Milky Way formed at roughly the same time – 13.5 billion years ago – near the beginning of the Universe. Our galaxy is thought to look much like Andromeda. Both Andromeda and the Milky Way got to their current size by eating up other galaxies they collide with. The expansion of the Universe causes most galaxies to move away from us, but Andromeda and the Milky Way are actually headed towards each other.

Andromeda and the Milky Way are good neighbors, but eventually our neighbor is going to move in with us – the Milky Way and Andromeda are approaching each other at 200 kilometers per second, and will eventually collide. There’s no need to panic, though, as Andromeda is over 2 million light years away, and the collision won’t happen for another 2 or 3 billion years. Astronomer John Dubinski of the University of Toronto has an excellent animated simulation from multiple perspectives of what this galactic dance could look like.

The collision between Andromeda and the Milky Way won’t be catastrophic, and after about 5 billion years from now the resulting galaxy will have settled down into an elliptical galaxy. There is a small chance, though, that the Sun won’t be part of this new “Milkomeda” galaxy.

Fraser and Pamela discuss how the collision between the Milky Way and Andromeda will look from Earth in the September 28th, 2008 episode of Astronomy Cast, and the Milky Way in Episode 99.

Mass of the Milky Way

The Milky Way and its dark matter halo. Image credit: Sloan Digital Sky Survey

[/caption]

The mass of the Milky Way depends on what you consider this question to mean. If you are only talking about the visible part of the Milky Way – all the stars, gas and dust that make up the disk – then the Milky Way’s mass is between 200-600 billion times that of the Sun. We can’t just put the Milky way on a bathroom scale to get this number, however. This number is reached by counting the number of stars in the galaxy and assuming their mass is roughly that of the Sun. The mass varies depending on where one defines the edge of the Milky Way to be.

But there is another way to check the heft of the Milky Way – by measuring how fast stars are rotating around the disk, the mass of the disk itself can be determined. In other words, the heavier the Milky Way is, the more of an effect gravity will have on the rotation, and the faster the stars will move through the disk. This number comes up to be a whopping 1-2 trillion times the mass of the Sun!  The most recent estimate from a study using information from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey measuring the velocity of over 2,4oo stars put the mass of the Milky Way and its halo at 1 trillion solar masses. Though astronomers don’t use kilograms when measuring such large objects as the Sun or galaxies, the Milky Way and its halo would be about 6 x 10^42 kilograms.

Where is all of this matter, if not in the stars? As with many contemporary mysteries in astronomy, the answer is dark matter. The Milky Way is thought to be home to a halo of dark matter – matter that cannot be detected except through its gravitational influence – which makes up approximately 80-90% of its mass. That’s right, the mass of the Milky Way that can be seen (through visible, X-ray, infrared, etc.) makes up only about 10-20% of its mass. This halo may extend out to as far as 300,000 light years from the galactic center.

For more information about the Milky Way, you can refer to Episode 99 of Astronomy Cast, visit the rest of our section here in the Guide to Space, or Swinburne Astronomy Online.

Source:
Sloan Digital Sky Survey