StarGazer’s Telescope: So Long, Saturn…

StarGazer's Scope

As the summer nights in the northern hemisphere grow short, Saturn fades quickly to the west and with it takes our great views of the solar system’s most serene and restful planet. If you were to walk out tonight and point a small telescope Saturn’s way, what would you see? Step right up the the StarGazer’s Telescope and let’s look…

Saturn, the sixth planet from the Sun, has the most spectacular set of rings in the solar system – ones which are easily seen in even the smallest of telescopes. Even at roughly 793 million miles away, we can still see this thin band of icy particles and rubble circling the magnificent planet. Maybe it was a comet that ventured too close… Perhaps Saturn’s moons collided… But no matter what the explanation is, the gentle yellow serenity of Saturn is something to behold.

Can you see Saturn’s gentle, yellow color? Much of the atmosphere of Saturn is made of hydrogen and helium, but there is also water vapor, methane, ammonia, and nitrogen. While it looks warm by nature, these cloudtops are quite cold, about –220° Fahrenheit. Winds in the upper atmosphere reach 500 meters (1,600 feet) per second in the equatorial region which is about five times faster than any hurricane force wind ever encountered here on Earth. These super-fast winds, combined with heat rising from within the planet’s interior, cause the yellow and gold bands visible in the atmosphere.

Did you know Saturn was the most distant of the five planets known to the ancients? In 1610, Galileo Galilei was the first to gaze at Saturn through a telescope and his view wasn’t even as close to as good as what we see here. In 1659, Christiaan Huygens, used a far more powerful telescope and announced that Saturn was surrounded by a thin, flat ring. A few years later in 1675, Jean-Dominique Cassini discovered a ‘division’ between what are now called the A and B rings. Thanks to modern science, we now know the gravitational influence of Saturn’s moon Mimas is what’s responsible for the black band known as Cassini Division. Can you see it peeking in and out when the atmosphere gets steady? Even from all these millions of miles away, we’re still able to resolve a feature which is 4,800 kilometers (3,000 miles) wide.

Do you want a real rush? While you’re looking at Saturn, click here. This is an audio file of radio emissions from Saturn. The Cassini spacecraft began detecting these radio emissions in April 2002, when Cassini was 374 million kilometers (234 million miles) from the planet, using the Cassini radio and plasma wave science instrument. Isn’t it creepy? It’s also kind of beautiful too… Like listening to whale songs.

Now move over… It’s my turn at the eyepiece.

Cosmic Monster – N44 by Don Goldman

N44 - Don Goldman

Deep in the large Magellanic Cloud a 325 light-year sized cosmic monster is born. Its open maw spans some 250 light years across, and from it spews massive particle winds. Held in its glowing gas jaws could be the expanding shells of old supernovae and it has even coughed forth hot X-ray emitting gas. What exactly is this wide-mouthed creature? Step inside…

In the area of open star cluster NGC1929, a complex nebula known as the N44 superbubble has been the controversial study of many telescopes and scientists over the years. This “super bubble” may have formed when one or more massive stars in the central cluster exploded as supernovae, blowing a hole through the nearby turbulent gas complex. But a lot of uncertainties of its evolution still remain. “When we look at the speed of gases in this cloud we find inconsistencies in the size of the bubble and the expected velocities of the winds from the central cluster of massive stars,” says astronomer Phillip Massey, “Supernovae, the ages of the central stars, or the orientation and shape of the cloud might explain this, but the bottom line is that there’s still lots of exciting science to be done here.”

So what’s at home in this area? Try Wolf-Rayet stars, evolved massive stars, O-type supergiants, high mass double-lined binaries, luminous blue variables and luminous B(e) stars. These are massive stars that have formed very quickly but at differing metallicities. Winds and intense radiation from hot, young, luminous stars in N44F excite and sculpt filaments and streamers of the glowing nebular gas.

Buried in it’s mouth is an OB association of stars known as LH47. According to Wills (et al), “The IMF of the stars outside the shell shows a slightly steeper slope than inside the shell. The slope of the IMF is very similar to values found for other associations and open clusters as well as in the solar neighborhood, thus supporting the idea of an universal shape of the IMF. LH47 turns out to be a well behaved young association embedded in a molecular cloud.”

So it it possible that N44F is actually a “super shell” instead of a superbubble? According to studies done by E.A. Magnier (et al); “Superbubbles are the shells found around OB associations. Supergiant shells are the shells found around large stellar “complexes”. Both may contain hot gas, but the heating history and cooling timescales are likely to be very different. N44 and LMC-2 in the Large Magellanic Cloud are the only resolved superbubble and supergiant shell to have been observed. These two structures are generally similar, morphologically, but have very different size. There have been reports of blowouts in both structures.”

But supernovae – the death explosions of the massive short lived stars – have also likely contributed to the region’s enormous, blown-out shapes. According to Georgelin (et al): “The bubbles of unknown origin have line ratios greater than those of the H II regions and thus appear to fill the gap between thermal and nonthermal radio sources. All the bubbles or filamentary nebulae have important internal kinematical motions. The large complex nebulae have values similar to simple H II regions in their brightest parts, while the faintest parts exhibit greater dispersions and conspicuous splittings and broadenings. The ionized bubbles appear to be intermediate between classical young H II regions and supernova remnants.”

But taken an even closer look and you’ll see there’s another bubble as well. It is believed that as superbubbles expand and age their surface brightness fades. Finally it is thought that superbubbles can trigger new star formation in areas of the shells where gases condense. According to Sally Oey of the University of Michigan, X-ray-emitting gas is escaping from N44F with a temperature of about 1,000,000 Kelvin. While established massive stars may very well be key contributors to the diffuse hot gas throughout space, Oey and Massey report: “We examined the stellar population which is associated with a superbubble region in the N44. We find no evidence that an unusual stellar population gave rise to the shell morphology of the gas.”

So what exactly is going on with this cosmic monster? We know N44 contains the X-ray-brightest superbubble and the break-out structure at the southern rim of the superbubble has been confirmed by the nebular dynamics and plasma temperature variations. However, Sungeun Kim and associates also have their own take; “The total kinetic energy of the neutral and ionized gas of Shell 1 is still more than a factor of 5 lower than expected in a pressure-driven superbubble. It is possible that the central OB association was formed in a molecular cloud, and a visible superbubble was not fully developed until the ambient molecular gas had been dissociated and cleared away. This hypothesis is supported by the existence of a molecular cloud toward N44 and the fact that the apparent dynamic age of the superbubble Shell 1 is much shorter than the age of its OB association LH 47.”

Even though it is a safe160,000 light years away, the combined action of stellar winds hurling forth a storm of particles moving at about 7 million kilometers per hour and multiple supernova explosions is frightening enough. Combined with several compact star-forming regions at the rim and a central star ejecting more than a 100 million times more mass per second than our Sun is only part of what makes this “cosmic monster” both beautiful and terrifying to behold.

Many thanks to MRO/AORAIA member, Don Goldman for producing this incredibly inspiring image and allowing us to share your work!

What is the Largest Moon in the Solar System?

Ganymede
This Galielo image shows Jupiter's moon Ganymede in enhanced colour. The JWST aimed its instruments at our Solar System's largest moon to study its surface. Credit: NASA

Many people think that the answer to ‘what is the largest moon in the Solar System’ is our Moon. It is not. Our Moon is the fifth largest natural satellite. Ganymede, a moon of Jupiter, is the largest in this solar system. At 5,268 km at the equator, it is larger than Mercury, the dwarf planet Pluto, and three times larger than the Moon orbiting Earth. According to information from NASA,if Ganymede were to break free of Jupiter’s gravitational pull it would be classified as a planet.

Ganymede has an iron-metallic core that generates a magnetic field. The core is surrounded by a mantle of rock, which is, in turn, covered by a thick shell of ice and rock. The outer shell is up to 800 km thick. On top of the outer shell is a thin layer of material(accreted?) that is a mixture of ice and rock. In images taken by the Hubble Space Telescope in 1996, astronomers discovered a tenuous atmosphere of oxygen. The atmosphere would not support known life forms, but its very existence is interesting to science.

Through spacecraft observation, there are several facts known about the surface of Ganymede. Its surface shows two types of terrain. Forty percent of the surface is covered with highly cratered dark regions, while the remainder is covered by light grooved terrain. The light grooving forms intricate patterns across surface of the moon, some of which are thousands of km long. Sulcus, a term that means a groove or burrow, is often used to describe the grooving. This portion of the terrain was most likely formed by tensional faulting or the release of water from beneath the surface. Ridges as high as 700 m have been observed. The dark regions are heavily cratered, old and rough, and are believed to be the original crust of the moon.

Ganymede was discovered by Galileo on January 7, 1610. He made the discovery, along with three other Jovian moons. It marked the first time a moon was discovered orbiting a planet other than Earth. The discovery contributed to the acceptance of the heliocentric viewpoint over the geocentric that held sway prior to that.

Now you know the answer to ‘what is the largest moon in the Solar System’ and a few interesting facts about Ganymede. Jupiter has 63 moons, so there are plenty more facts for you to discover.

Here’s another article about Ganymede, and one about Ganymede’s lumpy interior.

Here’s a list of all the largest moons in the Solar System, and a listing of the largest moons and smallest planets at Solar Views.

We have recorded a whole series of podcasts about the Solar System at Astronomy Cast. Check them out here.

References:
NASA Solar System Guide: Ganymede
Wikipedia: Ganymede
NASA Multimedia

Weekend SkyWatcher’s Forecast: July 11-13, 2008

Half Moon by Roger Warner

Greetings, fellow SkyWatchers! Our weekend begins with one very hot look at a very cool area of the Moon – the lunar poles. Why is finding ice just so important? Hang on to your eyepiece because we’ll continue this lunar expedition with some mountain climbing and a look at the big lunar picture. Before our weekend is out, we’ll take a trip to the land of Yed and find out what’s coming up on Monday night. Time to slip into the night… Together.

Friday, July 11 – Tonight let’s take look at the lunar poles by returning to an old previous study crater, Plato. North of Plato you will see a long horizontal area of grey floor – Mare Frigoris – the “Cold Sea.” North of it you will note a “double crater.” This elongated diamond-shape is Goldschmidt, and the crater which cuts across its western border is Anaxagoras. The lunar north pole isn’t far from Goldschmidt, and since Anaxagoras is just about one degree outside of the Moon’s theoretical “arctic” area, the lunar sunrise will never go high enough to clear the southernmost rim. As proposed with yesterday’s study, this “permanent darkness” must mean there is ice! For that very reason, NASA’s Lunar Prospector probe was sent to explore here. Did it find what it was looking for? Answer – Yes!

Lunar Pole - NASAThe probe discovered vast quantities of cometary ice which has hidden inside the crater’s depths untouched for millions of years. If this sounds rather boring to you, then realize this type of resource may aid our plans to eventually establish a manned base on the lunar surface!

On March 5, 1998 NASA announced that Lunar Prospector’s neutron spectrometer data showed water-based ice was discovered at both lunar poles. The first results showed the “ice” mixed in with lunar regolith (soil, rocks and dust), but long-term data confirmed nearly pure pockets hidden beneath about 40 centimeters of surface material – with the results being strongest in the northern polar region. It is estimated there may be as much as 6 trillion kilograms (6.6 billion tons) of this valuable resource! If this still doesn’t get your motor running, then realize that without it we could never establish a manned lunar base because of the tremendous expense involved in transporting our most basic human need – water.

The presence of lunar water could also mean a source of oxygen, another vital material we need to survive. In order to return home or voyage onward, these same deposits could provide hydrogen which could be used as rocket fuel. So as you view Anaxagoras tonight, realize you may be viewing one of mankind’s future “homes” on a distant world!

Saturday, July 12 – Tonight let’s take an entirely different view of the Moon as we do a little “mountain climbing!” The most outstanding feature on the visible surface will be the emerging Copernicus, but since we’ve delved into the deepest areas of the lunar surface, why not climb to some of its peaks?

Using Copernicus as our guide, to the north and northwest of this ancient crater lie the Carpathian Mountains ringing the southern edge of Mare Imbrium. As you can see, they begin well east of the terminator, but look into the shadow! Extending some 40 kilometers beyond the line of daylight, you will continue to see bright peaks – some of which reach a height of 2072 meters. When the area is fully revealed tomorrow, you will see the Carpathian Mountains disappear into the lava flow that once formed them.

Lunar Map - Image by Greg Konkel

Continuing onward to Plato, which sits on the northern shore of Imbrium, we will look for the disjointed line of (1) Montes Recta – the “Straight Range.” Further east you will find the scattered peaks of (2) the Teneriffe Mountains. It is possible these are the remnants of much taller summits of a once stronger range, but only around 1890 meters of them still survive above the surface.

To the southeast, (3) Mons Pico stands like a monument 2400 meters above the grey sands – a height which places it level with Kindersley Summit at Kootenay Park in British Columbia. Further southeast is the peak of (6) Mons Piton – also standing alone in the barren landscape of Imbrium. Perhaps once a member of the (5) Montes Alpes to the east, Piton still towers 2450 meters above the surface with a base 25 kilometers in diameter still remaining in the lava flow. Yet look closely at the lunar Alpes, for (4) Mons Blanc is 3600 meters high!

Just north of shallow Archimedes stand (7) the Montes Spitzbergen whose remaining expanse trails away for 60 kilometers on the southern edge of a rille which begins at the small punctuation of crater Kirch to the north. While they only extend 1500 meters above the surface, that’s still comparable with the outer Himalayans!

Sunday, July 13 – So what if it’s the 13th? If you’re not superstitious, but only having bad luck in finding lunar features – then how about if we take a look at one that’s incredibly easy to find? We’ll continue our lunar mountain climbing expedition and look at the “big picture” on the lunar surface.

Gibbous Moon - Roger WarnerTonight all of Mare Imbrium is bathed in sunlight and we can truly see its shape. Appearing as a featureless ellipse bordered by mountain ranges, let’s identify them again. Starting at Plato and moving east to south to west you will find the Alps, the Caucasus, and the Apennines (where Apollo 15 landed) at the western edge of Palus Putredinus. Next come the Carpathian Mountains just north of Copernicus. Look at the form closely: doesn’t it appear that perhaps once upon a time an enormous impact created the entire area? This was the Imbrium impact: compare it to the younger Sinus Iridum. Ringed by the Juras Mountains, it may have also been formed by a much later and very similar impact.

And you thought they were just mountains…

Palomar Observatory courtesy of CaltechNow let’s have a look with our eyes first at Delta Ophiuchi. Known as Yed Prior (“the hand”), look for its optical double Epsilon to the southeast, symmetrically named Yed Posterior. Try using binoculars or a telescope at absolute minimum power for another undiscovered gem…

Delta Ophiuchi is 170 light-years from us, while Epsilon is 108 – but look at the magnificent field they share. Stars of every spectral type are in an area of sky which could easily be covered by a small coin held at arm’s length. Enjoy this fantastic field – from the hot, blue youngsters to the old red giants!

Now, keep a watch out for a certain old, red giant named Antares on Monday night, June 14. For many of us, the Moon and the Rival of Mars are going to be hauntingly close – close enough to be an occultation event for some lucky observers!

Have a great weekend….

This week’s images are: Lunar North Pole – Credit: NASA, Lunar Mountain Peaks – Image Credit: Greg Konkel Annotations: Tammy Plotner, Half and Gibbous Moon – Credit: Roger Warner, and Delta Ophiuchi – Credit: Palomar Observatory courtesy of Caltech.

What is the Hottest Place in the Solar System?

Solar prominences on the Sun. Image credit: NASA

The hottest place in the Solar System is the Sun, obviously. And the hottest part of the Sun is its core. The surface of the Sun is a mere 5,800 Kelvin, while the center of the Sun is around 15 million Kelvin. That’s hot.

Although the surface of the Sun is relatively cool, the corona can get much hotter. This is the region just above the surface of the Sun, where flares and coronal mass ejections come from. Temperatures in this region can get upwards of 2 million Kelvin.

Okay, outside of the Sun, the hottest place in the Solar System is the core of Jupiter. Once again, while the cloud tops of Jupiter are more than 100 degrees below zero, the core of the planet could be up to 30,000 Kelvin. This high temperature comes from the intense pressure that comes from the entire mass of the planet bearing down on the core and compressing it.

What’s the hottest surface in the Solar System? That would have to be the surface of Venus, which is always an average temperature of 461 °C. In fact, Venus is even hotter than the planet Mercury when it’s in the Sun. Noontime temperatures on the surface of Mercury only get up to 426 °C.

Here’s an article from Universe Today about the hottest place on Earth, and more about the Sun.

Here’s more information about the Sun, and just how hot Venus is.

We have recorded a whole series of podcasts about the Solar System at Astronomy Cast. Check them out here.

Baby Boomer Galaxy Found

This galaxy, Zw II 96 (about 500 million light-years away) resembles the Baby Boom galaxy which lies about 12.3 billion light-years away and appears in images as only a smudge.

A group of telescopes got together recently to check out a little hanky-panky going on in a galaxy in a very remote part of the universe. The Hubble and Spitzer Space Telescopes, Japan’s Subaru Telescope, the James Clerk Maxwell and the Keck Telescopes, all on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, and the Very Large Array in New Mexico pooled their various optical, infrared, submillimeter and radio capabilities to see why a distant galaxy appears to be conceiving stars at a tremendously fast rate. This galaxy, which has now been dubbed the “Baby Boom” galaxy, is giving birth to about 4,000 stars per year. In comparison, our own Milky Way galaxy turns out an average of just 10 stars per year. These telescopes weren’t just playing the part of a Peeping Tom; astronomers want to find out more about this incredibly fertile galaxy.

“This galaxy is undergoing a major baby boom, producing most of its stars all at once,” said Peter Capak of NASA’s Spitzer Science Center at the California Institute of Technology, Pasadena. “If our human population was produced in a similar boom, then almost all of the people alive today would be the same age.”

The discovery goes against the most common theory of galaxy formation, the Hierarchical Model. According to the theory galaxies slowly bulk up their stars over time, and not in one big burst as “Baby Boom” appears to be doing.

The Baby Boom galaxy, which belongs to a class of galaxies called starbursts, is the new record holder for the brightest starburst galaxy in the very distant universe, with brightness being a measure of its extreme star-formation rate. It was discovered and characterized using a suite of telescopes operating at different wavelengths. NASA’s Hubble Space Telescope and Japan’s Subaru Telescope, atop Mauna Kea in Hawaii, first spotted the galaxy in visible-light images, where it appeared as an inconspicuous smudge due to is great distance.

It wasn’t until Spitzer and the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope, also on Mauna Kea in Hawaii, observed the galaxy at infrared and submillimeter wavelengths, respectively, that the galaxy stood out as the brightest of the bunch. This is because it has a huge number of youthful stars. When stars are born, they shine with a lot of ultraviolet light and produce a lot of dust. The dust absorbs the ultraviolet light but, like a car sitting in the sun, it warms up and re-emits light at infrared and submillimeter wavelengths, making the galaxy unusually bright to Spitzer and the James Clerk Maxwell Telescope.

To learn more about this galaxy’s unique youthful glow, Capak and his team followed up with a number of telescopes. They used optical measurements from Keck to determine the exact distance to the galaxy — a whopping12.3 billion light-years. That’s looking back to a time when the universe was 1.3 billion years old (the universe is approximately 13.7 billion years old today).

The astronomers made measurements at radio wavelengths with the National Science Foundation’s Very Large Array in New Mexico. Together with Spitzer and James Clerk Maxwell data, these observations allowed the astronomers to calculate a star-forming rate of about 1,000 to 4,000 stars per year. At that rate, the galaxy needs only 50 million years, not very long on cosmic timescales, to grow into a galaxy equivalent to the most massive ones we see today.

“Before now, we had only seen galaxies form stars like this in the teenaged universe, but this galaxy is forming when the universe was only a child,” said Capak. “The question now is whether the majority of the very most massive galaxies form very early in the universe like the Baby Boom galaxy, or whether this is an exceptional case. Answering this question will help us determine to what degree the Hierarchical Model of galaxy formation still holds true.”

“The incredible star-formation activity we have observed suggests that we may be witnessing, for the first time, the formation of one of the most massive elliptical galaxies in the universe,” said co-author Nick Scoville of Caltech.

Original News Source: JPL

How Old Am I? Star Cluster Perplexes Astronomers

Ever have one of those moments when you can’t remember how old you are? A group of astronomers may have felt they were having a “senior moment” when they couldn’t seem to figure out exactly the age of stars in the open star cluster NGC 6791, located in the constellation Lyra. Conventional thinking among astronomers is that stars in open clusters form at the same time, but in this particular cluster, researchers found stars at three different ages: one group of white dwarf stars appeared to be 4 billion years old, a second group of white dwarfs seemed to 6 billion years old, while the other regular stars were calculated to be 8 billion years of age. The astronomers say this dilemma may fundamentally challenge the way astronomers estimate cluster ages. Ivan King of the University of Washington and leader of the group using the Hubble Space Telescope to study this star cluster said: “This finding means that there is something about white dwarf evolution that we don’t understand.”

I just love it when astronomers say something like that, because it means they’ll return to their telescopes and the data in order to figure out the dilemma, and we’ll learn something new. And that’s just what they did. At least, partially.

“The age discrepancy is a problem because stars in an open cluster should be the same age. They form at the same time within a large cloud of interstellar dust and gas. So we were really puzzled about what was going on,” explained astronomer Luigi Bedin, who works at the Space Telescope Science Institute in Baltimore, Md.

After extensive analysis, members of the research team realized how the two groups of white dwarfs can look different and yet have the same age. It is possible that the younger- looking group consists of the same type of stars, but the stars are paired off in binary-star systems, where two stars orbit each other. Because of the cluster’s great distance, astronomers see the paired stars as a brighter single star.

Their brightness made them look younger.

Binary systems are also a significant fraction of the normal stellar population in NGC 6791, which contains over 10,000 stars, and are also observed in many other clusters. However, this would be the first time they have been found in a white-dwarf population.

“Our demonstration that binaries are the cause of the anomaly is an elegant resolution of a seemingly inexplicable enigma,” said team member Giampaolo Piotto the University of Padova in Italy.

Bedin and his colleagues are relieved that they now have only two ages to reconcile: an 8- billion-year age of the normal stellar population and a 6-billion-year age for the white dwarfs. All they need now is a process that slows down white-dwarf evolution.

Hubble’s Advanced Camera for Surveys analyzed the cooling rate of the entire population of white dwarfs in NGC 6791, from brightest to dimmest. White dwarfs are the smoldering embers of Sun-like stars that no longer generate nuclear energy and have burned out. Their hot remaining cores radiate heat for billions of years as they slowly fade into darkness. Astronomers have used white dwarfs as a reliable measure of the ages of star clusters, because they are the relics of the first cluster stars that exhausted their nuclear fuel.

White dwarfs have long been considered dependable because they cool down at a predictable rate. The older the dwarf, the cooler it is, making it a seemingly perfect clock that has been ticking for almost as long as the cluster has existed.

All right, astronomers, back to your telescopes to get this all figured out! And when they do, the rest of you can read about it on Universe Today. In the meantime, enjoy the lovely images above of star cluster NGC 6791.

News Source: Hubble press release

Let’s Study Law: Kepler Would Be So Proud!

Mars and Saturn Meet - Shevill Mathers

Just a couple of days ago we took a look at the splendid conjunction of Mars, Saturn and Regulus which occurred on July 6, 2008. Now, four days later, the position of everything has changed drastically. We watch it occur in the sky. We accept that it’s natural. We even know it’s celestial mechanics! But exactly what laws govern these movements and how do we understand them? Let’s take a look…

Johannes KeplerOnce upon a time, a very cool dude named Johannes Kepler was born just two days after Christmas in 1571. Like most of us, he had a pretty rough life. His dad died when he was 5, but he had a great mom who was not only a waitress, but a herbalist as well. One of the best things she ever did for her son was to take him out to watch the “Great Comet of 1577” and a lunar eclipse in 1580. Even though she ended up being later tried for witchcraft, the love of astronomy that she inspired in her son would shape the way we now understand planetary motion.

Even though smallpox crippled Kepler’s vision and hands, he excelled at studying planetary motion in the astrological sense and kept himself busy being a math teacher. In his spare time, he also liked to play around with lenses, too… and write letters to his friend Galileo Galilei. Even though he ran the risk of losing his job and getting in trouble with the church, Kepler defended Copernican theory of a sun-centered system and went on to devise some formulae of his own. At age 24, he was teaching a class about the conjunction of Saturn and Jupiter when he realized that regular polygons bound one inscribed and one circumscribed circle at definite ratios, which, he reasoned, might be the geometrical basis of the universe. Thankfully, his school supported him and published his work as the “Mysterium Cosmographicum” (The Cosmographic Mystery).

Fortunately, that was a good move and it landed Kepler a part time job helping out an astronomer named Tycho Brahe. To make a long story short, that was his introduction into the real world of astronomy and many long years and bad political times kept things from progressing. However, the astronomers of the time respected his work in their own ways and continued to test out Kepler’s theories – right down to his predictions when Venus and Mercury would transit the Sun. Yep. It would be long after Kepler died before his ideas were finally recognized, but these three principles withstood the test of time:

Kepler's Laws

1. The orbit of every planet is an ellipse with the sun at one of the foci.

2. A line joining a planet and the sun sweeps out equal areas during equal intervals of time. (Suppose a planet takes one day to travel from point A to B. The lines from the Sun to A and B, together with the planet orbit, will define a (roughly triangular) area. This same amount of area will be formed every day regardless of where in its orbit the planet is. This means that the planet moves faster when it is closer to the Sun.) This is because the sun’s gravity accelerates the planet as it falls toward the Sun, and decelerates it on the way back out, but Kepler did not know that reason.

3. The squares of the orbital periods of planets are directly proportional to the cubes of the semi-major axis of the orbits. Thus, not only does the length of the orbit increase with distance, the orbital speed decreases, so that the increase of the orbital period is more than proportional.

So what does studying these laws have to do with what we see? Let’s take a three day time lapse look…

Planetary Motion - July7-9, 2008 - Shevill Mathers

The observable distance between Saturn and Regulus hasn’t changed much has it? But the motion of Mars has been huge! When skies permit, make your own nightly observations of planetary motions and try studying Kepler’s law. We’ve watched Mars travel from points A to B. If we drew an imaginary line, from the Sun to the planet, it would sweep out a roughly triangular area and the same amount of area will be swept every day. As Mars progresses in its elliptical orbit, its distance from the Sun changes. As an equal area is swept during any period of time and the distance from Mars to the Sun varies, we can then plainly see that for the changes to remain constant that Mars must also vary in speed! Yep. It’s the second law.

Kepler would be so proud…

Many thanks to AORAIA member Shevill Mathers whose dedication and photographs helped make this article possible!

StarGazer’s Telescope – Last Dance With Mars

StarGazer's Scope

Have you ever wondered what it was like to look through a real telescope? Tired of being clouded out night after night and would be happy with a look through any telescope? After all the exciting news we’ve heard about Mars, I thought it might be fun to let you take a look through a small telescope and see what Mars really looks like – flaws and all.

Step right up here to the eyepiece and have a look! Remember this is just a small telescope, so what you see isn’t going to look like images taken with the Hubble – or still images that have been processed to bring out details. This is just pure and natural…

Mars is very low on the horizon right now and the skies are turbulent. This makes getting a very clear image of Mars difficult in any telescope. If you can at least see the dark notch that looks different from the rest of the planet then you’re spotting Sytris Major. Sure, it doesn’t look like the media likes to show it, but a long time ago in 1649, an astronomer named Christiaan Huygens was the very first person to resolve a surface feature on another planet. It probably looked very much like it does here!

I don’t care how many times I look at Mars, I still enjoy it’s red color. Yeah, I know Mars is red because it has such a thin atmosphere, which cannot hold the blue like the Earth’s atmosphere can. But Mars is also red because of all of the rusted iron dust surrounding the planet and all the rusted iron on the planet. Of course, I’m a firm believer that it’s better to burn out than it is to rust… But then I’m old, too.

Did you catch a twinge of blue around the edge? That’s another thing that fascinates me about Mars. Every time I see that, I know I’m seeing the carbon dioxide from the polar caps and that’s just too cool to me. And now your peek through the StarGazer’s Telescope has ended.

Move over, because it’s my turn.

What is the Second Smallest Planet in the Solar System?

Earth and Mars. Image credit: NASA/JPL

Pluto used to be the smallest planet, but it’s not a planet any more. That makes Mercury the smallest planet in the Solar System. The second smallest planet in the Solar System is Mars, measuring 6792 km across.

With all the focus and exploration of Mars, you’d think it’s a really big planet, but actually it’s pretty small. Mars has only 53% the diameter of Earth, and about 1/10th the mass. It only has 15% the volume of Earth. In other words, you could fit 6 planets the size of Mars into Earth, and still have room to spare.

Since Mars is relatively small compared to Earth, and it has a fraction of our planet’s mass, the force of gravity on Mars is very low. If you could walk on the surface of Mars, you would experience only 38% the force of gravity you feel pulling you down on Earth. In other words, if you weighed 100 kg on Earth, you’d feel like you only weighed 38 kg on Mars.

Mars is so small that its core cooled down billions of years ago, and so it doesn’t have a magnetic field any more. Earth’s magnetic field helps push away the Sun’s solar wind, which is trying to carry away our atmosphere. When you match this with its very low amount of gravity, and Mars has lost almost all its atmosphere. The pressure of the atmosphere on Mars is 1% what we experience on Earth.

Here’s an article that explains why Pluto isn’t a planet any more. And here’s the smallest planet in the Solar System.

Want more information? Here’s another article about the biggest planet in the Solar System, and the smallest planet in the Solar System.

We have recorded a whole series of podcasts about the Solar System at Astronomy Cast. Check them out here.