Could Antimatter Be Powering Super-Luminous Supernovae?

2007-1126supernova.thumbnail.jpg

Explosions are almost always cool, and supernovae are some of the most spectacular and violent explosions in the Universe. In 2006, the supernova SN 2006gy wowed scientists with a light show that was 10 times as luminous as the average supernova, challenging the traditional model of exactly how an exploding star creates a supernova. Astronomers suspect that the cause is the repeated production of antimatter in the core of the star.

Supernovae occur when a star nears the end of its life, and the nuclear processes that fuel the star push outward more powerfully than the force of gravity can hold the star together; the type of supernova created depends on the mass of the star. In stars with masses between 95-130 times the Sun, this process can occur more than once, creating a “pulsational” supernova which can happen as many as seven times.

The cause for the multiple explosions may have to do with the production of antimatter particles in the core, which then recombine and release large amounts of energy.

“The pair instability is encountered when, late in the star’s life, a large amount of thermal energy goes into making the masses of an increasing abundance of electron-positron pairs rather than providing pressure,” wrote Dr. Stan Woosley, of the Department of Astronomy and Astrophysics, USCS Santa Cruz.

What happens is this: the first supernova occurs, powered by the antimatter explosions in the core, and ejects a large amount of the star’s material out into space; however, there still remains enough matter near the core for the star to reignite and begin nuclear processes once again. After between a few hundred days and a few years, another supernova occurs by the same mechanism, and when the ejected material collides with the previous shell of ejected material, the interaction gives off enormous amounts of light.

This process only occurs with stars in the 95-130 solar mass range. Stars with solar masses under 95 undergo typical, non-repeating supernovae, while those over 130 solar masses are subject to the pair instability but explode with such force as to leave nothing near the core to recombine and start the process again.

The production of antimatter in the core, as well as the large amount of light given off by the repeated collision of the shells of ejected matter explains very well the otherwise puzzling luminosity of SN 2006gy.

“The model existed before 2006gy happened as well as the prediction of a possible bright supernova of this sort. When we learned of the supernova, we carried out much more detailed calculations specific to 2006gy and found, to our satisfaction, that many of the observed facts were in the model results,” Dr. Woosley said.

There are other possible candidates for this type of repeating supernova, including Eta Carinae, though they unfortunately may not all be as spectacular as SN 2006gy.

Source: Arxiv paper

Pure Carbon Stars Discovered

2007-1126dwarf.thumbnail.jpg

When stars like our Sun run out of fuel, they die a long slow death as a white dwarf, slowing cooling down over billions of years. But now an international team of astronomers has found an unusual form of white dwarf with a bare carbon core; one that might suggest a new sequence of stellar evolution. A fate for stars right on the edge of detonating as supernovae.

The majority of stars that die eventually become white dwarfs in the end. The most massive 2-3% of stars will actually detonate as supernovae when they end their lives. But these newly discovered objects might have been right at the borderline. If they were just a little more massive, they would have detonated as well, but instead, they didn’t quite make it.

The evidence was gathered by astronomers from the University of Arizona, Université de Montréal and Paris Observatory. They reviewed more than 10,000 new white dwarfs found in the most recent update to the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. This automated survey has turned up four times as many white dwarf stars as previously known.

As stars run out of hydrogen, they switch to helium, and as this burns off, they’re left with a core of carbon and oxygen surrounded by an atmosphere of hydrogen or helium. That’s what a normal white dwarf looks like.

But a small group of these white dwarfs have a very bizarre appearance. They’re just a bare core of carbon, without any surrounding atmosphere of hydrogen or helium.

From the press release announcing the discovery, researcher Patrick Dufour describes the discovery, “when I first started modeling the atmospheres of these hotter DQ stars, my first thought was that these are helium-rich stars with traces of carbon, just like the cooler ones. But as I started analyzing the stars with the higher temperature model, I realized that even if I increased the carbon abundance, the model still didn’t agree with the SDSS data. Out of pure desperation, I decided to try modeling a pure-carbon atmosphere. It worked. I found that if I calculated a pure carbon atmosphere model, it reproduces the spectra exactly as observed. No one had calculated a pure carbon atmosphere model before. No one believed that it existed. We were surprised and excited.”

The researchers believe you need to have a star with 9-11 solar masses to create a carbon star like this. They’re planning follow up observations to better pinpoint the masses of the objects they’ve discovered so far.

Original Source: UA News Release

Chandra Sees Star Formation in NGC 281

2007-1115ngc281.thumbnail.jpg

Here’s a short little post about the star forming nebula NGC 281, captured by NASA’s Chandra X-Ray Observatory. This photograph is actually a composite of several wavelengths, imaged by ground and space-based observatories.

The optical data (red, orange and yellow) shows the clouds of gas and dust, and the dark lanes of obscuring dust where stars may be forming. The Chandra X-Ray data is in purple, and reveals more than 300 individual X-ray sources – most of them are associated with the central star forming region.

There’s another group of X-ray sources on the other side of the molecular cloud. Based on the elements in the region, astronomers think that a supernova went off in the region recently.

But really, it’s a pretty picture.

Original Source: Chandra News Release

Planets Found Forming in the Pleiades Star Cluster

2007-1114pleiades.thumbnail.jpg

As you gaze up at the familiar Pleiades star cluster, here’s something new you can think about. Planets recently collided around two of the stars in the cluster, kicking up vast clouds of dust. New worlds are being formed, and destroyed, right before our very eyes. At least, if you’ve got the help from some of the most powerful telescopes on Earth, and in space.

This announcement was made by a team of astronomers using the Gemini Observatory in Hawaii and the Spitzer Space Telescope. Their findings will be published in an upcoming issue of the Astrophysical Journal.

The Pleiades star cluster – located in the constellation Taurus – is one of the most famous objects in the night sky. Easily visible to the unaided eye, it’s even more spectacular in binoculars or a small telescope. Although it’s often referred to as the “seven sisters”, the cluster actually contains 1,400 stars, in various stages of formation.

One of the stars, known as HD 23514, has a little more mass than our Sun. The astronomers discovered that it’s surrounded by an enormous disk of hot dust particles. Astronomers think that this is the debris from a planetary collision.

It’s believed that these dust particles, the building blocks of planets, accumulate into comets and asteroid-size bodies and then clump together into larger and larger objects. This is a violent process, though. Some objects get bigger, and others collide, shattering into dust that astronomers can detect.

Astronomers think that this is a similar process that led to the formation of the Earth’s moon. At some point in the early Solar System, a Mars-sized object collided with the Earth. The debris from that collision became the Earth and the Moon.

Two stars in the Pleiades cluster, HD 23514 and BD +20 307, are thought to be in this stage of evolution. They’re between 100 and 400 million years old. Much younger stars can have this dust when they’re 10 million years old, but it’s usually dissipated by the time a star reaches 100 million years old. It takes enormous planetary collisions to get the dust spewing out again.

Original Source: UCLA News Release

Podcast: When White Dwarfs Collide

2007-1109dwarfs.thumbnail.jpg

There’s a certain kind of supernova that’s totally dependable. Let a white dwarf accumulate 1.4 times the mass of the Sun, and it’ll detonate in an explosion visible clear across the Universe. When astronomers saw supernova 2006gz, that’s what they thought they were dealing with, but hold on, the explosion was much more powerful than you would expect from just a single white dwarf. Maybe two came together in a colossal explosion.

Malcolm Hicken is a graduate student at the Harvard University Department of Physics, and he’s the lead author of the team that made the explosive discovery, published in the November 1st issue of The Astrophysical Journal Letters.

Click here to download the audio file.

Spitzer Sees a Baby Star Blowing Bubbles

2007-1109bubbles.thumbnail.jpg

A new image released from NASA’s Spitzer Space Telescope shows a baby star blowing bubbles, just like, I guess, a kid with bubblegum. But let’s see your kid hurl out material hundreds of kilometres a second across light-years of space. Those are some big bubbles.

The infant star is known as HH 46/47, and it’s located about 1,140 light-years from Earth. The star itself is that bright white spot at the middle of the image.

Surrounding the star are two bubbles of material extending out in opposite directions. These bubbles are formed when powerful jets of gas collide with the cloud of gas and dust surrounding the star. The red specks at each end signify hot sulfur and iron gas, where the jets are colliding head on into the gas and dust material.

Astronomers think that young stars accumulate material by gravitationally pulling in gas and dust. This process ends when the star gets large enough to create these jets. Any further material is just blown away into space.

Producing this image was a bit of a technical achievement. The researchers at NASA’s JPL developed an advanced image-processing technique for Spitzer data called Hi-Res deconvolution. The process reduces blurring, and makes the image sharper and clearer. With this technique, astronomers were able to make out the details of HH 46/47, and its surrounding bubbles.

Original Source: NASA/JPL News Release

What if a Child is Born on the Moon?

2007-1105davinci.thumbnail.jpg

As humanity becomes a spacefaring civilization, we’re going to come up with tricky situations that challenge current laws and concepts of nationality. For example, what’s your country if you’re born on the Moon? Or if two astronauts get into a fight while in orbit, whose laws are followed? If you break a piece of an international module, where do you send the cheque? During a recent conference in Europe, scholars and space scientists met to propose unusual circumstances that might happen in space exploration

Law in space is currently covered by the Outer Space Treaty of 1967. It’s been ratified by 98 states, and follows the tradition of maritime law – states have legal jurisdiction within their own spacecraft. But what happens when a spacecraft has been built by several nations, such as the Columbus laboratory module, due to fly to the International Space Station in December.

The recent conference, called Humans in Outer Space – Interdisciplinary Odysseys was held on October 11-12 in Vienna, Austria.

The partner nations working to build the International Space Station have already rejected a proposal that the entire station falls under US law.

“It was agreed that each state registers its own separate elements, which means that you now have a piece of the US annexed to a piece of Europe annexed to a piece of Japan in outer space, legally speaking”, said Dr Frans von der Dunk of the International Institute of Air and Space Law at the University of Leiden.

Since each module is operated by a different nation, that sort of works. But in the case of the Columbus module, it was built and operated by several European nations. Since it’s a collaboration, it can’t be registered to any single state since there isn’t an entity called “Europe”.

There are issues of criminal law; what if one astronaut from one country punches another while in an international module? There are also patent law problems; where should an invention be patented? And there are civil law concerns; what happens if an astronaut damages a part of the station?

The meeting looked far into the future too, when bases are established on the Moon and Mars. Since the 1967 treaty defines the Moon for the good of all humanity, it can never be considered a territory of any country back on Earth. So what nationality would a child have?

The 1979 UN Moon Agreement provides rules on how nations should explore the Moon, but doesn’t go beyond to issues of civil and criminal law.

For now, if you’re born on the Moon, you’re from nowhere on Earth.

Original Source: ESF News Release

Colliding White Dwarfs Caused a Powerful Supernova

2007-1101colliding.thumbnail.jpg

There are a few ways that stars can go kaboom, and each variant is different enough that astronomers can figure out what kind of object detonated as a supernova. But when a bizarre explosion was detected last year, it left astronomers puzzled. Now, it looks like SN 2006gz might have been caused by two white dwarfs colliding together.

Millions of years ago, there were two regular stars in a binary system, orbiting one another. Over time, one, and then the other ran out of hydrogen fuel, bulged up as red giants, and then settled down to live out their futures as slowly cooling white dwarfs. But instead of billions of years of quiet cooling, the two stars had decaying orbits. They spiraled inward, and finally collided, detonating as supernova 2006gz.

When SN 2006gz was first discovered last year, astronomers thought they were dealing with a type Ia event. This is where a white dwarf is in a binary system with another star. Like a vampire, the white dwarf feeds on material from the companion star until it reaches 1.4 times the mass of the Sun. This magic point, called the Chandrasekhar limit, is the upper limit of mass a white dwarf can have. And when that limit is reached, the white dwarf detonates as a supernova, visible for billions of light years.

The problem is that SN 2006gz seemed to be too bright. In other words, it must have gotten more mass than the Chandrasekhar limit before detonating. It also had the strongest spectral signature of unburned carbon ever seen.

And that was the key. Mathematical models suggested that colliding white dwarfs would generate this specific signature of unburned carbon. They also suggested that an explosion should contain evidence of compressed layers of silicon, created during the explosion and then compressed during the shockwave that rebounded from the surrounding layers of carbon and oxygen – this too was seen.

Thanks to good observations, SN 2006gz was relatively easy to recognize as a collision between white dwarfs. But this event might be more common in the Universe, and astronomers will need to go back and carefully analyze supernovae on record to see if they’ve been wrongly categorized.

Original Source: CfA News Release

Book Review: Protostars and Planets V

2007-1101protostars.thumbnail.jpg

Fabulous theories predict a dynamic, temporal universe. Assuming a special beginning and a robust continuance, we can imagine a transformation to the state we see today. But, we’ve every reason to believe that changes continue apace. We know stars disappear in cosmically vibrant explosions. We expect stars equally arise from dust fields. This is where the book Protostars and Planets V fits in. Within its covers, the editors Bo Reipurth, David Jewitt and Klaus Keil provide a rich and rewarding collection of papers about dust, star births and other exciting dynamics.

As noted in the book’s preface, a conference about early solar system formation seemed premature in the 1970s as no planets outside our solar system were known. Nevertheless, a conference and resulting publication showed the interest in this field. Since then, regular conferences with this theme have been held. The fifth in 2005 gave rise to this book. What makes this field more and more exciting is the continual discovery of planets orbiting other stars and their kin. Hence data can corroborate or stymie conjectures and true scientific progress takes place. The collection of papers in this text shows the strength and breadth that continues to make this field exciting and advancing.

Given the physical size of this book, partly due to its nearly thousand page count, there’s no surprise that lots lies within. Suffice to say that, as with most scientific fields, there’s broad amounts of data, analysis and modeling. The real data is somewhat sparse still yet, every new discovery or detection gets readily absorbed. The papers often have pointed reviews of data and then provide conjectures about the temporal processes and dynamics that gave rise to the observations. And, it seems all were completed by very talented and learned authors; 249 in total. These authors provide a rich and varied view and perspective, many of which will undoubtedly lead to surprises and advances.

With such a bright pool of writers and noting that this book results from a conference, the reader must be prepared to wade through without assistance. Equations are the norm rather than the exception. Given the dynamic nature of the subject, base physics involving density, temperature, pressure and photons are thrown about with the freedom that comes from every day usage. Yet, there’s no appearance of showmanship. Rather, the reports in this book demonstrate an eagerness and sincerity in the belief that the offerings are making a significant contribution to science.

Nevertheless, this is the proceedings from the fifth conference and within are allusions to a sixth. Thus, the reader needs to realize that the content represents ongoing work rather than a penultimate conclusion. Presumably we will continue to build and utilize better observatories and more capable computers. Hence, this book is an excellent snapshot of activity in 2005. But, there were referrals to new observations not yet fully analyzed but likely to skew the statistics. In consequence, the book’s contents would be great for a reader who wants to catch-up on this particular topic as there is no conclusion. Further, with authors’ names and indications of funding sources, a reader has got a ready way to follow-up. And, they could get help directing their own work, contemplate choices about how they could aid in the research or simply keep up to date.

Given the narrowness of the topic and the complexity of the presentation, the general reader or hobbyist will have a challenge cruising through the pages. But, there’s lots to discover for those so desiring. There’s dust columns that might indicate the size of dust fields, metrics that indicate if a planet is in the habitable zone and models that show the likelihood of accretion or disintegration. Just be prepared to have to wade through thick details full of charts, acronyms and specialist lingo. Much can be discerned, but the average reader will have to work at it; it’s not offered up on a plate.

The continual fly-by of comets shows everyone on Earth that our universe is rich in dynamics. Those with access to observatories and their resulting images know that the dynamism extends throughout space. The editors Bo Reipurth, David Jewitt and Klaus Keil provide papers in their book entitled Protostars and Planets V that show how such dynamism could lead to new stars out of a field of dust. Hence that wonderful expression, “We’re all made from star dust” is all the more apt!

Read more reviews online, or purchase a copy from Amazon.com.

Carnival of Space #27 – and an Announcement

2007-1101balloon.thumbnail.jpg

I’m happy once again to be the host of the Carnival of Space, here at Universe Today. I also wanted to announce that I’m going to be taking over the reins of the carnival from the founder, Henry Cate, who’s getting a little spread too thin with everything he’s working on. A big thanks to Henry for putting the time to get things to this point, and I hope I’m able to live up to the high standards he created. If you have any questions, just drop me an email at [email protected].

Now, onto the carnival.

Space Files writes about a little known amateur-built satellite bound for Mars.

Have you ever wondered what the Milky Way would look like if you could get outside it? astropixie takes us on a tour out of the galaxy, step by step.

Maybe there isn’t any such thing as dark matter. Centauri Dreams looks at an alternative theory to Newtonian gravity that might just solve the problem.

Surfin English shows the tricks, tools and techniques you need to photograph the planets.

As the media focuses its attention on the troubles with torn solar arrays and stuck joints affecting the latest shuttle/ISS mission, Stuart Atkinson, is frustrated by the lack of attention paid to a very special and historic meeting that took place at the start of the mission.

Once it was thought that moons could not exist within the Roche Limit. Now there is evidence of moons and possibly other massive objects. Since Saturn’s Rings contain conditions similar to the Solar System’s formation, they may shed light on how our Earth was formed. From A Babe in the Universe.

And finally, from my own Universe Today, I humbly offer up this article about the search for the origins of the Tunguska impactor.