Planetary Potential from Protoplanetary Disks

How planets form is one of the major questions in astronomy. Only recently have we been able to study the disks of dust and gas surrounding other stars in an effort to understand the process of how planets coalesce and form from these “protoplanetary” materials. But this is a difficult task at best, given the observational distances. “This is a vast topic with many challenges,” said David Wilner from the Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astronomy at his talk at the American Astronomical Society meeting this week. “But over the course of the past few decades with observations of nearby star systems, we’ve come to a basic outline of the process of solar system formation.”

There are a couple of hurdles to overcome in studying protoplanetary disks. First, the bulk of the disk mass is cold and dark, as the molecular hydrogen doesn’t radiate. These areas are probed only through a couple of minor constituents: thermal emission from dust and scattered light from the star.

Second, the amount of “stuff” astronomers are looking at is actually fairly small. Usually, the amount of protoplanetary material is about 1/100th the mass of the star, and about 1/4000th of a degree in the sky.

Through observations of many systems with several telescopes, we can see these disk systems in a variety of wavelengths in an effort to see both the star and the disk components. Wilner said there are two properties that are particularly important to know: Disk masses in general, as the luminosity is directly proportional to the mass, and second is the disk lifetime. From current knowledge, the dust disk disperses by 50% in 3 million years, and 90% by 5 million years.

As an example, Milner discussed the Rho Ophiuchi nebula, (image above), located near the constellations Scorpius and Ophiuchus, about 407 light years away from Earth.

“The Rho Oph cloud is spectacular, with beautiful dark regions that are columns of gas and dust extinguishing the background star field. This is the material that is forming stars and planets.”

Wilner said the steps in solar system formation are as follows: first the formation of a primordial proto-star disk, then the protoplanetary disk, and then debris disk within a planetary system.

But the main problems in our understanding lies in that astronomers haven’t yet actually seen all the steps in this process, and can’t prove directly that these early disks go on to form the planets. There are several clues, such as that gaps form in the dust around clumps of materials, similar to the gaps in the rings of Saturn around moons.


For the past 15 years protoplanetary disks have been studied with various interferometers at the Keck Observatory on Mauna Kea at various wavelengths from .87 microns to 7 mm. And the past five years the Spitzer Space Telescope has lent its infrared capabilities to further our knowledge to our current understanding. But soon, a new telescope in the high Chilean desert might provide the resolution needed to offer a glimpse at not only the gaps in the disks, but a new window on how materials around emerging planets may form moons. The Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array (ALMA), will operate at wavelengths of 0.3 to 9.6 millimeters.

Wilner obviously looks forward to putting observational capabilities of this array to work. Scheduled to be completed in 2012, ALMA will help fill in the “gaps” of our knowledge about planetary formation.

Source: AAS Meeting presentation, with clarification from Chris Lintott

Carnival of Space #57

This week, the Carnival of Space moves over to Out of the Cradle; and ladies… this one’s for you.

Click here to read the Carnival of Space #57

And if you’re interested in looking back, here’s an archive to all the past carnivals of space. If you’ve got a space-related blog, you should really join the carnival. Just email an entry to [email protected], and the next host will link to it. It will help get awareness out there about your writing, help you meet others in the space community – and community is what blogging is all about. And if you really want to help out, let me know if you can be a host, and I’ll schedule you into the calendar.

Finally, if you run a space-related blog, please post a link to the Carnival of Space. Help us get the word out.

Air on Mars

The air on Mars would kill a human quickly. The atmosphere is less than 1% of Earth’s, so it would be hard to breath. What you would have available to your lungs would be undesirable to say the least. The air on Mars consists of 95% carbon dioxide, 3% nitrogen, 1.6% argon, and the remainder is trace amounts of oxygen, water vapor, and other gases.

On Earth, oxygen accounts for an average of 21% of the air that we breath. Humans can survive on lower concentrations, but not much lower. Oxygen is spread throughout our bodies by our red blood cells and our bodies thrive. The high concentration of carbon dioxide in the Martian atmosphere would replace oxygen in our red blood cells and the average human would die in less than 3 minutes if left unprotected on the surface. Of course, that assumes that air quality is the only factor considered. The cold and other factors would probably kill someone faster than the poor air quality.

We think of Mars as a dry, dead planet. That is fairly accurate, but at night the planet achieves 100% humidity. During the day it is very dry, here is why. Humidity is the amount of water vapor in the air. It varies daily and depends on the temperature: warm air can hold more water vapor than cold air . Humidity is measured as a percentage of the maximum amount of water that the air can hold at a given temperature. The greater the difference between the two temperatures, the greater the evaporation. When there is a lot of evaporation, the air is drier and the humidity is low. On Mars, the air is saturated (100% humidity) at night, but undersaturated during the day. This is because of the huge temperature difference between day and night.

The air on Mars was much different early in the history of the Solar System. Many scientists believe that the planet was warm and had a thicker atmosphere. Unfortunately, the planet lacked two important ingredients: plate tectonics and a magnetic field. Had those developed, Mars could have developed enough oxygen to support lifeforms similar to those on Earth.

The air on Mars is a major deterrent to human exploration of the planet. Here is a link to a video showing a Russian experiment to overcome this challenge. For now, poor air quality and nearly two years in space will keep humans pondering manned flight to the planet, but who knows what the future will hold.

More information on the Martian atmosphere from David Darling’s Encyclopedia of Science.

Here’s an interesting video, where Russian volunteers test out breathing air on Mars.

Finally, if you’d like to learn more about Mars in general, we have done several podcast episodes about the Red Planet at Astronomy Cast. Episode 52: Mars, and Episode 91: The Search for Water on Mars.

Source: NASA

What is the Closest Planet to Mars?

Want to know the closest planet to Mars? Look down beneath your feet… you’re looking at it. That’s right, the closest planet to Mars is our own home planet: Earth.

During their orbits, Earth and Mars can get as close as about 55 million kilometers. Since both Earth and Mars orbit the Sun, they can also be on opposite sides of the Sun. At that point, the two planets can be as far as 400 million km apart.

Because of this vast range in distances between when Earth and Mars are close and far, you can see why Mars can be sometimes very bright in the sky, and hard to see other times.

Just for comparison, Mars only gets within 490 million km of Jupiter at its closest. So Mars is always closer to Earth, and the rest of the inner planets, than it is to Jupiter.

There are several images of Earth captured by spacecraft, either orbiting Mars, or roving around on its surface. If you could live on Mars, Earth would be a very bright object in the sky. Of course, since Earth’s orbit is inside the Mars orbit, our home planet would be an evening or morning star, just like the view of Venus from Earth.

And if you’re wondering how far Earth is from Mars, here’s the answer. And no, Mars isn’t going to look as big as the Moon in August; that’s a hoax.

The same question has been answered over at Wikianswers.

Finally, if you’d like to learn more about planet Mars in general, we have done several podcast episodes about the Red Planet at Astronomy Cast. Episode 52: Mars, and Episode 91: The Search for Water on Mars.

Was There a Planet Between Mars and Jupiter?

Main Belt Asteroids
Ceres, the recently promoted dwarf planet in the asteroid belt is still too small to be easily seen by Hubble credit: NASA/ESA/STScI

When astronomers looked at the orbits of the planets, they felt that there could be a planet “missing” in between the orbits of Jupiter and Mars. In fact, this is where the asteroid belt is; a collection of large and small rocky objects.

Could this be the missing planet? Astronomers think that Jupiter formed early enough that its gravity ruined the chances for another planet to assemble itself in the region between Mars and Jupiter.

When you add up the total mass of all the objects in the asteroid belt, you only get enough material to be about the same size as Saturn’s relatively small moon Rhea. So you couldn’t really call that a planet.

However, back in the day when Jupiter formed, it’s possible that there was much more material in this region than what we see today. The intense gravity of Jupiter would have reached out and perturbed the orbits of the planetesimals in the region. Some would have been kicked out into the outer Solar System, and others would have been driven inward to collide with the Sun, or crash into the inner planets.

It’s also possible that a planet was there in the early Solar System, but then a large collision knocked it off course, and it spiraled inward or outward, never to be seen from again.

Here’s an article from Universe Today about water on asteroid Ceres, and an asteroid that broke up more than 8 million years ago.

Here’s the question answered at Astronomy Cafe, and a Wikipedia article about Phaeton (a hypothetical planet between Mars and Jupiter).

Finally, if you’d like to learn more about planet Mars in general, we have done several podcast episodes about the Red Planet at Astronomy Cast. Episode 52: Mars, and Episode 91: The Search for Water on Mars.

Does Mars Have Rings?

Martian moon Phobos

Recently, while discussing what she had learned in class, my daughter asked me: ”does Mars have rings?”. She is ten and it is fun to see her interested in anything educational. Unfortunately, I had to tell her that no, Mars does not have rings. While saying no was disappointing, it left a good opportunity to teach her how planetary rings are formed..

Planetary ring systems are formed in two ways. The first is by ice and dust like those around the ice giants and similar to the rings around Saturn. Scientist believe that the particle have been captured by a planet’s gravity and are prevented from combining into a moon by that gravity. The rings are visible because of the light that the particles reflect. In the case of Saturn, some of the moons within the rings system have ice geysers that some scientist think are constantly replenishing the rings.

A second way that a planetary ring may form is through impact. If a large enough asteroid were to impact a planet, dust and rock debris would be thrown into space. That debris would then be captured by the planet’s gravity. Scientists believe that the debris will fall back to the planet, but do not know how long it would take.

Mars may develop a ring system in the future. Scientists know that Mar’s moon, Phobos, is in a decaying orbit around the planet. In anywhere from 10 million to 100 million years it will crash into the planet forming a ring system as the debris is ejected back into space. After a million or so years, that ring system will collapse back onto the planet’s surface, causing an extensive crater field.

That begs the question of how did Phobos find itself in such a predicament. Well, it is most likely a captured asteroid. Its orbit took it too close to Mars and it did not have enough velocity to escape the planet’s gravity. Many moons in our Solar System have come to orbit their primaries in this fashion. Usually, small moons are captured and large moons form in situ, so to speak.

Now you know the answer to ”does Mars have rings?” and a little about a rings in the planet’s future. Don’t forget to read up on Mar’s other moon Deimos and maybe look a little deeper into Phobos. If planetary rings interest you, NASA has plenty of information on their website.

Here’s an article the describes how Phobos will eventually crash into Mars. And here’s some more information about what Saturn’s rings are made of.

The Planetary Rings Node has many resources for Saturn’s rings. And here’s an article about potential rings around Pluto.

We’ve covered Mars in the past at Astronomy Cast. Episode 52: Mars, and Episode 91: The Search for Water on Mars. We also talk about Saturn’s rings in Episode 59: Saturn.

Sources:
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/ask_astro/answers/981027a.html
http://solarsystem.nasa.gov/planets/profile.cfm?Object=Mar_Phobos
http://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap080414.html

Pictures of Planet Mars

Mars, just a normal planet. No mystery here... (NASA/Hubble)

The planet Mars is one of the most photographed objects in the Solar System. There are hundreds of thousands of images of Mars, seen from the ground, from orbit around the planet, and from here on Earth. With so many photos of Mars to choose from, it’s impossible to show them all, but we can show some of our favorites.


This is a picture of Mars captured by the Hubble Space Telescope on October 28, 2005, when Mars was just about to make its closest approach to Earth. If you look carefully, you can see a regional dust storm. When this amazing pic was taken, the dust storm was about the size of Texas.



This is a picture of Mars captured by NASA’s Mars Exploration Opportunity rover. It shows the Victoria Crater on the surface of Mars. Opportunity slowly made its way up to the edge of the crater, and then crawled down inside to examine the rock walls for past evidence of liquid water on the surface of Mars.



This looks like a plain old image of a crater on Mars, but it’s much more special than that. The inset box on the left-hand side is NASA’s Phoenix Mars Lander descending to the surface of Mars. The image was captured by NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter which had been positioned to watch the spacecraft descend.



The largest canyon in the Solar System is the amazing Valles Marineris on Mars. Stretching more than 4,000 km long, and as deep as 7 km, it would cross the United States if put on Earth. This is a photograph of just one portion of the canyon, captured by ESA’s Mars Express spacecraft.



More than 1000 separate pictures of Mars captured by the Viking Orbiter were stitched together to create this composite image of Mars. This is one of the most beautiful, high-resolution images of Mars ever captured. Olympus Mons and the other large volcanoes are on the left-hand side of the photo. Valles Marineris is down at the bottom, and the northern polar ice cap is up at the top.

Want more photographs of Mars, just click here to search Universe Today and see hundreds of photographs.

Here’s NASA’s photo gallery of Mars. And additional pictures of Mars from Nine Planets.

Finally, if you’d like to learn more about planet Mars in general, we have done several podcast episodes about the Red Planet at Astronomy Cast. Episode 52: Mars, and Episode 91: The Search for Water on Mars.

Closest Images Ever of Mars Dust Grains

“To see a world in a grain of sand…” – English Poet William Blake

The Phoenix science team tested out the lander’s Optical Microscope by imaging grains of sand and dust particles, some as small as one-tenth the diameter of a human hair. These are the highest resolution image ever of small soil particles from another planet. “We have images showing the diversity of mineralogy on Mars at a scale that is unprecedented in planetary exploration,” said Michael Hecht of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory.

The microscope observed particles that had fallen onto an exposed surface of the lander. “It’s a first quick look,” Hecht said. “This experiment was partly an insurance policy for something to observe with the microscope before getting a soil sample delivered by the arm, and partly a characterization of the Optical Microscope. All the tools are working well.”

However, some of the particles may be “alien” – that is, they might have come from inside the spacecraft when Phoenix dropped to Mars surface at landing. But at first glance, many of these grains match expectations for Martian particles. “We will be using future observations of soil samples delivered by the Robotic Arm to confirm whether the types of particles in this dustfall sample are also seen in samples we can be certain are Martian in origin,” Hecht said.

The particles show a range of shapes and colors.

“You can see the amount of variety there is in what appears otherwise to be just reddish brown soil,” said Tom Pike, Phoenix science team member from Imperial College London. He noted that one translucent particle resembles a grain of salt, but that it is too early to say for sure.

Meanwhile, Phoenix received commands Thursday to collect its first soil sample to be delivered to its science lab instrument on the lander deck. Those commands were originally sent on Wednesday, but the lander didn’t receive them as the relay for the commands, the Mars Odyssey, had gone into safe mode. The orbiter may have been hit by a cosmic ray, and engineers from JPL say nominal operations of the spacecraft should return by the end of the week. This type of event has occurred a couple of times in the Odyssey mission, and engineers don’t appear overly concerned about the situation.

So, the commands were successfully re-sent via the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter. Look for the first science results from Phoenix within the next day or so.

Original News Source: Phoenix news release

Toilet is Fixed and Kibo is Switched On – A Great Day Aboard the ISS (Video)

Artists impression of the completed ISS - Kibo can be clearly seen (NASA)

It has been a very good day for the crew on board the International Space Station. Not only has the brand new Japanese Kibo science laboratory been activated, much to the crew’s relief, the faulty toilet has also been fixed. Russian flight engineer Oleg Kononenko was able to replace the broken urine collection pump in a 2 hour repair job yesterday (Wednesday) and specialists in Moscow checked his work to verify it was working fine. Although this may sound like a bit of minor news, it was make-or-break time for the ISS as if the repair was unsuccessful, this may have seriously hindered the manned presence on the station (and besides, we haven’t even had time to play with Kibo yet!)…

It looks like the replacement part for the ISS toilet is working as it should after it was delivered by Discovery on June 2nd. Cosmonaut Oleg Kononenko successfully carried out the technical plumbing job and all seems to be flushing as it should. Although a toilet fix in space may not seem like a critical factor, 10-days without a functioning toilet on board the ISS have been difficult for the crew. Until now, all crew members have had to make do with the single toilet facility on board the Russian Soyuz vessel currently docked at the station. It is fortunate the break-down happened when it did, with enough time for the Russian space agency to send replacement parts to the US in time for Space Shuttle Discovery’s launch last weekend.

As Kononenko worked on the unglamorous task of fixing the toilet, the other astronauts were working on installing Kibo. All connections from Kibo to the station had to be made, including water supply, power and air, and today it was pressurized and powered up. The new Kibo science laboratory that was attached to the station on Tuesday following a six-hour spacewalk by two astronauts to prepare for its installation. Everything is looking good and the crew hope to open the hatch, float in and explore the station’s brand new science module some time today.

View the Reuters video report about the plumbing trouble on the ISS »

Source: USA Today

Odyssey Possibly Hit by High-Energy Particles; Phoenix Science Run About to Begin

A successful scoop of Martian regolith (NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Arizona/Max Planck Institute)

NASA’s Mars Odyssey has been switched into “safe-mode” after possibly being hit by energetic particles from the Sun, or by cosmic rays. Acting as one of two relay satellites between Earth and Phoenix, this has hindered commands to be sent to the lander, thereby slowing its progress. Phoenix is just about to start scence digging operations on the surface (Martian regolith is shown in the Phoenix test-run scoop of material, pictured). It seems likely that Odyssey will remain in the protective safe-mode until the weekend whilst operators try to understand what caused the problem. For the time being, the second relay satellite NASA’s Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO) will try to take up the slack and keep the lander in contact with mission control…

This is the second communications error in the otherwise flawless Phoenix Mars mission. The first occurred two days after touch down when the MRO switched its UHF radio into standby mode. Yesterday’s (Wednesday’s) error with another Mars-orbiting satellite, Odyssey, probably won’t be repaired until Saturday. Mission engineers believe the error may have occurred when energetic space particles interrupted Odyssey’s onboard memory. As a safety precaution, the onboard hardware was switched into a low-energy state to protect it from any damage. This event doesn’t seem to be serious, but it does slow down the progress of Phoenix which is currently excavating Mars material from the surface of the red planet, trying to understand the composition of permafrost layers.

The Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter has stepped in for Odyssey (NASA)

Although frustrating, this setback will not cause too many problems to Phoenix, daily commands can still be sent to the MRO and relayed to Phoenix and the first delayed science excavation run is scheduled for today. Test runs over the past few days have revealed a white substance in the fist-sized samples of regolith, so scientists are very excited to “bake” the permafrost material to see if water ice or salt deposits are present. After the preliminary tests, mission scientists believe that Phoenix’s 8-foot robotic arm is up to the task and appears to be functioning excellently.

The following steps will be carried out in the first science run scheduled to start today:

  1. Right of the test-dig area, scientists have identified three “science rich” zones. Phoenix will dig into areas known playfully as “Baby Bear”, “Mama Bear” and “Papa Bear”, after the “Goldilocks” fairy tale. Presumably they are looking for a dig that will be “just right”.
  2. The first dig will cut 3/10 of an inch into the permafrost at the location of “Baby Bear”, and scoop up the material.
  3. With the material safely in the scoop, Phoenix will swing its arm 90 degrees towards the onboard miniature oven. It will then wait for further commands.
  4. Assuming the MRO delivers the commands from mission control, Phoenix will be instructed to drop the sample into the oven so it can be baked. Instruments will be used to look deep into the vapour given off to look for signs of carbon or hydrogen-containing organic compounds. It is at this point that the lander will evaluate the samples to see whether there is in fact current water ice on the surface.

Over the next few days samples from all the Goldilocks sites will be analysed. These are exciting times, let’s hope there are no further communications problems…

Source: Associated Press (printed at Physorg.com)