Measuring a Day on Saturn

Dreamy colours of Saturn. Image credit: NASA/JPL/SSI. Click to enlarge
With solid planets, like the Earth and Mars, it’s easy to track the length of their days. Just watch for a surface feature to rotate into view again. With gas giants, however, it’s a tricky business. Scientists have used features of Saturn’s magnetic field to act like objects on its surface; tracking the amount of time it takes for that point in the magnetic field to rotate around again. Cassini has determined that Saturn’s day is 10 hours, 47 minutes, 6 seconds (+- 40 seconds).

We all know Earth rotates every 24 hours, but scientists have long had difficulty pinpointing how long the day is on Saturn. The magnetometer onboard the Cassini spacecraft has, for the first time ever, measured a periodic signal in Saturn’s magnetic field, key information to finally understanding the length of a Saturn day and the evolution of this gaseous planet.

The latest research suggests a Saturn day is 10 hours, 47 minutes, 6 seconds (plus or minus 40 seconds). That’s 8 minutes slower than NASA Voyager results from the early 1980s, and slower than previous estimates from another Cassini instrument. The magnetometer results provide the best estimate of the Saturn day to date, because it can see deep inside Saturn. These Cassini results are in the May 4 issue of the journal Nature.

“Measuring the rotation period of a rocky planet like Earth is easy, but measurements for planets made of gas, such as Saturn, pose problems,” said the lead author of the paper, Dr. Giacomo Giampieri, a researcher at NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif.

Planets rotate around their “spin” axes as they orbit about the sun. Rocky planets like Earth and Mars have rotation periods that are easy to measure because we can see surface features as they go by, such as the continents as viewed from space. Gaseous planets do not have a solid surface to track.

The magnetic field is generated deep inside Saturn’s liquid metallic core by flowing electric currents. By measuring the field, researchers can determine the length of the day on Saturn.

“Making this measurement has been one of the most important science goals for the mission,” said Professor Michele Dougherty of Imperial College London. “Finding a distinct periodic rhythm in the magnetic field helps us understand the internal structure of Saturn that in turn will help us understand how it formed.”

Knowing the length of a day or how fast the planet rotates is critical to understanding the internal structure of the planet and modelling the weather patterns on Saturn.

On approach to Saturn, Cassini’s radio and plasma wave instrument measured radio signals and predicted that the day on Saturn was 10 hours, 45 minutes, 45 seconds. That was considered a very good estimate at the time.

Since the Voyager days scientists have been seeing changes in the period of radio observations. They knew that it was virtually impossible to slow down or speed up a mass as large as Saturn. As Cassini’s measurements of the rhythms of natural radio signals from the planet continued to vary, scientists began to realize these signals were probably not a direct measurement of the internal rotation rate. Suddenly the length of Saturn’s day became uncertain. Measurements of the magnetic field help scientists “see” deep inside Saturn and may have finally solved this puzzle.

“Our magnetic field measurements have remained constant since Cassini entered orbit almost two years ago, while radio measurements since the Voyager era have shown large variability. By monitoring the magnetic field over the rest of the mission, we will be able to solve this puzzle,” Giampieri.

In addition to Giampieri the other authors are: Michele Dougherty, from Imperial College, London; Edward Smith also from JPL; and Christopher Russell from the University of California, Los Angeles.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the Cassini-Huygens mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, Washington. The Cassini orbiter was designed, developed and assembled at JPL. The magnetometer team is based at Imperial College in London, working with team members from the United States and several European countries.

For images and more information, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/cassini and http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov.

Original Source: NASA News Release

Huygens Landing Movie

Titan’s surface. Image credit: ESA. Click to enlarge
Researchers from NASA, ESA and the University of Arizona have put together a new animation that shows what the Huygens probe saw as it landed on Titan on January 14, 2005. The 5-minute video was put together with data collected by Huygen’s Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer instrument. The scene below the lander is a mosaic, updated piece by piece as the instrument captured new images.

New views of the most distant touchdown ever made by a spacecraft are being released today by NASA, the European Space Agency and the University of Arizona. The movies show the dramatic descent of the Huygens probe to the surface of Saturn’s moon Titan on Jan. 14, 2005.

The movies were put together with data collected by the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer instrument during the probe’s 147-minute plunge through Titan’s thick orange-brown atmosphere to a soft sandy riverbed. The Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer was funded by NASA.

The data were analyzed for months after the landing and represent the best visual product obtained from the Huygens mission. It is the most realistic way yet to experience the Huygens probe landing. The movie “View from Huygens on Jan. 14, 2005,” provides in 4 minutes and 40 seconds of what the probe actually “saw” during the 2.5 hours of the descent and touchdown.

“At first, the Huygens camera just saw fog over the distant surface,” said Erich Karkoschka, team member at the University of Arizona, Tucson, and creator of the movies. “The fog started to clear only at about 60 kilometers [37 miles] altitude, making it possible to resolve surface features as large as 100 meters [328 feet],” he said. “But only after landing could the probe’s camera resolve little grains of sand millions and millions of times smaller than Titan. A movie is a perfect medium to show such a huge change of scale.”

For the second movie, scientists used artistic license and added sound to represent the different data sets collected. They re-created a scientifically accurate representation of the mission life in less than five minutes.

“These movies really demonstrate that the Huygens camera was very well designed for the job,” said Jean-Pierre Lebreton, Huygens project scientist and mission manager at the European Space Agency. “They show so many different details of a landscape that covers only a tiny fraction — one-thousandth — of Titan’s surface. This makes me dream of what a possible future mission to Titan may return of this wonderful and fascinating Earth-like world,” he said.

The Huygens probe was delivered to Saturn’s moon Titan by the Cassini spacecraft, which is managed by NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, Calif. NASA supplied two instruments on the probe, the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer and the Gas Chromatograph Mass Spectrometer.

The Cassini spacecraft continues orbiting Saturn in its second year of its four-year tour. Cassini’s next Titan flyby is on May 20, 2006. Twenty-two flybys of Titan are planned this year by Cassini, with 45 total flybys of Titan in the full tour.

The new movies and images are available at: http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov, http://www.nasa.gov/cassini, http://saturn.esa.int and http://www.lpl.arizona.edu/DISR/.

The Cassini-Huygens mission to Saturn and Titan is a joint mission of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. ESA supplied and manages the Huygens probe that descended to Titan’s surface. NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington. NASA funded the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer, which was built by Lockheed Martin. University of Arizona Lunar and Planetary Laboratory scientist Martin Tomasko leads the Descent Imager/Spectral Radiometer team. Team members are based throughout the United States and Europe.

Original Source: NASA/JPL/SSI News Release

Jupiter Will Be Closest on May 6th

Jupiter and its moon Ganymede. Image credit: Alan Friedman. Click to enlarge
Look east in the early evening and you’ll see a very bright star. Well, that’s not a star, it’s Jupiter – and now’s the best time to go take a look at it. Jupiter will reach its closest approach to the Earth on May 6th. Even in small backyard telescopes, many features of the planet are visible, including its bands and 4 larger moons. If you’ve got a larger telescope, you might be able to pick out the newly formed storm dubbed “Red Spot Jr.”.

If you feel the urge to look up at the sky this month, you might be feeling the pull of Jupiter.

The giant planet is having a close encounter with Earth all month long. On May 6th, the date of closest approach, Jupiter will be 410 million miles away, which is almost 200 million miles closer than it was just six months ago in October. This makes Jupiter unusually big and bright.

Look for it rising in the east at sunset. Jupiter is unmistakable, shining ten times brighter than any star around it. The view through a backyard telescope is dynamite. You can see Jupiter’s cloud belts, the Great Red Spot and four large moons (Io, Europa, Ganymede and Callisto) circling the planet.

When you look at Jupiter through a telescope, you might notice something odd: the planet looks squashed. Your eyes are okay. Jupiter truly bulges around the middle because it spins so fast. One complete turn of the planet takes only 10 hours. That’s more than 300 Earth masses (almost enough to make a star) spinning like a nimble asteroid.

This spinning allows you to see the entire planet in a single night. On May 6th, Jupiter is “up” for more than 10 hours, or one complete turn. Judo astronomers will attempt a Jupiter marathon: In 10 hours you can see the innermost moons of Jupiter move from one side of the planet to the other. You can watch the Great Red Spot, a hurricane twice as wide as Earth, churn across Jupiter’s cloudtops. You might even see “Red Jr.,” a baby Great Red Spot trailing the original by about 2 hours: full story.

Although closest approach is May 6th, the best night to look is May 11th when the full Moon and Jupiter appear side by side. The pair will rise in tandem at sunset and remain beautifully close together all night long. With a telescope you can quickly scan back and forth: The lunar Alps. The moons of Jupiter. The Sea of Tranquillity. The Great Red Spot.

This is a sky map.

Do you feel the pull yet?

Let’s calculate: Jupiter is 318 times more massive than Earth and 410 million miles away. According to Newton’s Law of Universal Gravitation, Jupiter pulls you up 34 million times less than Earth pulls you down. Jupiter’s “pull” is utterly feeble.

So it’s all in your mind. But don’t let that stop you: give in to the pull!

Original Source: NASA News Release

Companion Star Changed Supernova’s Appearance

The Galaxy NGC 7424 as imaged by Gemini. Image credit: Gemini South GMOS. Click to enlarge
When a supernova was discovered in December 2001, astronomers immediately tagged it as a Type II – when a gigantic star runs out of fuel and explodes. But then the tell tale hydrogen surrounding it disappeared, and astronomers had to re-classify it as a Type I supernova – when a white dwarf steals matter from a companion. Astronomers using the Gemini telescope in Chile think they’ve solved the mystery. They found a companion star left behind when the supernova exploded; this was providing the hydrogen, and masking the original supernova.

Using the Gemini South telescope in Chile, Australian astronomers have found a predicted “companion” star left behind when its partner exploded as a very unusual supernova. The presence of the companion explains why the supernova, which started off looking like one kind of exploding star, seemed to change its identity after a few weeks.

The Gemini observations were originally intended to be reconnaissance for later imaging with the Hubble Space Telescope. “But the Gemini data were so good we got our answer straight away,” said lead investigator, Dr. Stuart Ryder of the Anglo-Australian Observatory (AAO).

Renowned Australian supernova hunter Bob Evans first spotted supernova 2001ig in December 2001. It lies in the outskirts of a spiral galaxy NGC 7424, which is about 37 million light-years away in the southern constellation of Grus (the Crane).

The supernova was monitored over the next month by optical telescopes in Chile. Supernovae are classified according to the features in their optical spectra. SN2001ig initially showed the telltale signs of hydrogen, which had it tagged as a Type II supernova, but the hydrogen later disappeared, which put it into the Type I category.

But how could a supernova change its type? Only a handful of such supernovae, classified as “Type IIb” to indicate their curious change of identity, have ever been seen. Only one (called SN 1993J) was closer than SN 2001ig.

Astronomers studying SN1993J had suggested an explanation: the supernova’s progenitor had a companion star that stripped material off the star before it exploded. This would leave only a little hydrogen on the progenitor-so little that it could disappear from the supernova spectrum within a few weeks.

A decade later observations with the orbiting Hubble Space Telescope and one of the Keck telescopes in Hawaii confirmed that SN 1993J did indeed have a companion. Ryder and colleagues wondered if SN2001ig might have had a companion as well.

Soon after SN2001ig was discovered, Ryder and his colleagues began monitoring it with a radio telescope, the CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation) Australia Telescope Compact Array in eastern Australia. The radio emission did not fall off smoothly over time but instead showed regular bumps and dips. This suggested that the material in space around the star that exploded-which must have been shed late in its life-was unusually lumpy.

Although the lumps might have represented matter periodically shed from the convulsing star, their spacing was such that another explanation seemed more likely: that they were generated by a companion in an eccentric orbit. As it orbited, the companion would have swept material shed by the progenitor into a spiral (pinwheel) pattern, with denser lumps at the point in the orbit-periastron-where the two stars approached most closely.

Such spirals have been imaged around hot, massive stars called Wolf-Rayet stars by Dr Peter Tuthill of the University of Sydney, using the Keck telescopes. The bumps in the radio light-curve of SN2001ig were spaced in a way consistent with the curvature of one of the spirals Tuthill has imaged.

“Stellar evolution theory suggests that a Wolf-Rayet star with a massive companion could produce this unusual kind of supernova,” said Ryder.

If the supernova progenitor had a companion, it might be visible when the supernova debris had cleared. So the astronomers put in a request to observe with the GMOS (Gemini Multi-Object Spectrograph) camera on the 8-meter Gemini South telescope.

When the time came to observe, the “seeing conditions” (stability of the atmosphere) were excellent. Just an hour and a half was needed to image the supernova field-and reveal a yellow-green point-like object at the location of the supernova explosion.

“We believe this is the companion,” said Ryder. “It’s too red to be a patch of ionized hydrogen, and too blue to be part of the supernova remnant itself.”

The companion has a mass of between 10 and 18 times that of the Sun. The astronomers hope to use GMOS again in coming months to get a spectrum of the companion, to refine this estimate.

Binary companions could explain much of the diversity seen in supernovae, Ryder suggests. “We’ve been able to show the chameleon-like behaviour of SN2001ig has a surprisingly simple explanation,” he said.

This is only the second time a companion star to a Type IIb supernova has been imaged, and the first time the imaging has been done from the ground.

A paper on the observations, “A post-mortem investigation of the Type IIb supernova 2001ig”, co-authored by Ryder, University of Tasmania graduate student Clair Murrowood and former AAO astronomer Dr Raylee Stathakis, was published online in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society on May 2. It is also available HERE.

Original Source: Gemini Observatory

Cassini Sees New Craters on Titan

Shikoku Facula region on Titan. Image credit: NASA/JPL/SSI. Click to enlarge
Cassini recently swept past two previously unexplored regions of Titan, and returned radar images of its surface. Cassini made its flyby on April 30, targeting the Xanadu region – one of the most prominent features on Titan, which is even visible from Earth. It revealed strange curving features that could indicate flowing fluids. There are also two large craters that could be from meteor impacts or volcanic calderas. This was Cassini’s 14th Titan flyby, with the next on May 20.

Saturn’s moon Titan continued to surprise scientists during a flyby that took Cassini into regions previously unexplored by radar. Two very noticeable circular features, possible impact craters or calderas, appear in the latest radar images taken during the flyby on April 30, 2006.

The flyby targeted Xanadu, one of the most prominent features on Titan, visible even from telescopes on Earth. The origin of Xanadu is still unknown, but the radar images reveal details previously unseen, such as numerous curvy features that may indicate fluid flows. Scientists speculate that two prominent circular features are probably impact craters but they don’t rule out the possibility that they might be calderas or volcanoes. Sand dunes, discovered in previous flybys, continue to crisscross Titan’s surface.

Communication from the spacecraft was temporarily interrupted for nearly five hours during the data playback following the flyby. The most important science data from the flyby were protected by a contingency plan put in place in advance of the flyby. The flight team believes the outage was likely due to a galactic cosmic-ray hit on a power switch in the spacecraft communications subsystem. The anomaly resulted in the loss of some science data. However, the spacecraft is now performing normally.

This was the 14th Titan flyby for Cassini, with nine more remaining this year. The next will be May 20, 2006. During the nominal four-year mission Cassini will perform 45 Titan flybys.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. JPL, a division of Caltech, manages the mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate. The Cassini orbiter was designed, developed and assembled at JPL.

For images and more information, visit: http://www.nasa.gov/cassini and http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov .

Original Source: NASA/JPL/SSI News Release

Book Review: Galaxy Formation and Evolution


Digital cameras are all the rage today, but one that’s limited to a 12 by 12 array isn’t going to carry much weight. Such slight detail prevents distinguishing people’s faces or much else. Yet as Hyron Spinrad describes in his book Galaxy Formation and Evolution, often this is the broadest amount of information available for whole galaxies. In spite of this, he shows that there’s no shortage of interpretations, even with such slight references.

Our solar system lies in an adjunct arm of the Milky Way galaxy. Our galaxy spans many light years in all directions and not long ago it was thought to define the limits to our universe. Thanks to better instrumentation and advances in the knowledge of physics, we know that our galaxy is one of countless others that expand to no known limit in extent. As far as we see, galaxies in a myriad of shapes sprinkle the darkness between stars. But with humankind’s aptitude for classification, we’ve been busy searching for and sorting galaxies as they make themselves known. Using Hubble’s tuning fork diagram, galactic emission lines, and our understanding of nucleosynthesis, we can group galaxies and postulate their evolution. That is, having seen the beginning of time via COBE and WMAP, we can guess on the sequence of events that led to the night skies we see today.

Spinrad’s aim in his book is to summarize recent discoveries and physically-based theories for the research professional or learned amateur. As such he delivers. He starts with an assessment of nearby galaxies. From these, he sets expectations on size, shape, speed and emission types and rate. Then, from a copious selection of papers and presentations, he extends the review to the farther reaches. Reciting a potpourri of techniques and tricks, he presents the works of many other researchers. Each section of each chapter takes a new look at the challenge. From baryon density to the Lyman alpha optical depth to the luminosity of active galactic nuclei, he considers how measurements and expectations combine together to build a plausible galactic morphology.

This book is not for the scientific faint of heart. It has a wealth of detailed information written with the assumption that the reader has strong knowledge of the field. Classifications are key and most seem to consider results from statistical binning. Often the statistics is based upon little data, whether images are 12 by 12 pixels or only ten’s of images appear for a given z redshift value. Thus, Spinrad makes judicious use of the word ‘probably’. But building on experience and using the results of ever more detailed sky surveys by ever more capable instruments he shows how a certain sense or rhythm occurred as high density regions evolved into stars, galaxies and clusters. As well, from this we can see where we in the Milky Way Galaxy are heading to.

Spinrad does bring a broad range of detail into the question of galactic formation, but his book isn’t smooth. Reading it is like reading conference proceedings; the topics are relevant but a storyline is missing. All his references come from recognized astronomy journals and most referrals are to editions from within the previous six years. This lends the belief that the content is recent, applicable and valid. Perhaps the targeted research professional would find this book of value, but it’s hard to see how it adds to the information already presented in the journals.

The expectations of the reader’s knowledge also quickly becomes apparent. Acronym’s abound but no ready list aids the reader to recover their meaning. Equations are sprinkled throughout but are seldom used or explored. Further, with a few striking editorial errors and an index that is on occasion incorrect, the book gives the impression of having been rushed to publication. In a sense, it is more like a collection of review notes that the author made and then quickly submitted to the publisher perhaps in the hopes of besting others. If the reader is looking for a particular viewpoint of this data, this book would be of value, but don’t expect a detached, well planned perspective.

Astronomy is a demanding research field. Instrumentation from all over the Earth’s surface and positioned high above our planet detect the slight emissions from far away sources. Hyron Spinrad in his book Galaxy Formation and Evolution summarizes much of the current work of scientists who analyze the received data and then use results to piece together likely processes. Though far away, the galaxies in our universe are becoming clearer.

Review by Mark Mortimer

Read more reviews online or purchase a copy from Amazon.com

XMM-Newton Finds Objects in its Spare Time

XMM-Newton slew survey of the Vela supernova remnant. Image credit: ESA. Click to enlarge
For most of its time, ESA’s XMM-Newton observatory is staring intently at a single object. But astronomers have figured out how to use the time the observatory spends turning from object to object – called “slewing”. Over the past 4 years, the observatory has actually imaged 25% of the sky in this way. A newly released sky survey contains this “spare time” data, which includes thousands of objects, many of which were previously unknown.

For the past four years, while ESA’s XMM-Newton X-ray observatory has been slewing between different targets ready for the next observation, it has kept its cameras open and used this spare time to quietly look at the heavens. The result is a ‘free-of-charge’ mission spin-off ? a survey that has now covered an impressive 25 percent of the sky.

The rapid slewing of the satellite across the sky means that a star or a galaxy passes in the field of view of the telescope for ten seconds only. However, the great collecting area of the XMM-Newton mirrors, coupled with the efficiency of its image sensors, is allowing thousands of sources to be detected.

Furthermore, XMM-Newton can pinpoint the position of X-rays coming from the sky with a resolution far superior to that available for most previous all-sky surveys. This is sufficient to allow the source of these X-rays to be found in many cases.

By comparing XMM-Newton survey’s data with those obtained over a decade ago by the international ROSAT mission, which also performed an all-sky survey, scientists can now check the long-term stability, or the evolution, of about two thousand objects in the sky.

An initial look shows that some sources have changed their brightness level by an incredible amount. The most extreme of these are variable stars and more surprisingly galaxies, whose unusual volatility may be due to large quantities of matter being consumed by an otherwise dormant central black hole.

The slew survey is particularly sensitive to active galactic nuclei (AGN) – galaxies with an unusually bright nucleus ? which can be traced out to a distance of ten thousand million light years.

While most stars and galaxies look like points in the sky, about 15 percent of the sources catalogued by XMM-Newton have an extended X-ray emission. Most of these are clusters of galaxies – gigantic conglomerations of galaxies which trap hot gas that emit X-rays over scales of a million light years.

Eighty-one of these clusters are already famous from earlier work but many other clusters, previously unknown, appear in this new XMM-Newton sky catalogue.

Scientists hope that the newly detected sources of this kind also include very distant clusters which are highly luminous in X-rays, as these objects are invaluable for investigating the evolution of the Universe. Follow-up observations by large optical telescopes are now needed to determine the distances of the individual galaxies in the newly discovered clusters.

Using traditional pointed observations, it takes huge amounts of telescope-time to image very large sky features, such as old supernova remnants, in their entirety. The slewing mechanism provides a very efficient method of mapping these objects, and several have been imaged including the 20 000 year-old Vela supernova remnant, which occupies a sky area 150 times larger than the full moon.

Extraordinarily bright, low-mass X-ray binary systems of stars (called ‘LMXB’) ? either powered by matter pulled from a normal star, or exploding onto the surface of a neutron star, or being consumed by a black hole – are observed with sufficient sensitivity to record their detailed light spectrum. Passes across these intense X-ray sources can help astronomers to understand the long-term physics of the interaction between the two stars of the binary system.

Many areas of astronomy are expected to be influenced by the XMM-Newton sky survey. Today, 3 May 2006, the XMM-Newton scientist have released a part of the catalogue resulting from the initial processing of the highest quality data obtained so far.

Such data correspond to a sky coverage of about 15 percent, and include more than 2700 very bright sources and a further 2000 sources of lower significance. Currently, about 55 percent of the catalogue entries have been identified with known stars, galaxies, quasars and clusters of galaxies.

A faster turn-around of slew-data processing is now planned to catch interesting transient (or temporary) targets in the act, before they have a chance to fade. This will give access to rare, energetic events, which only a sensitive wide-angle survey such as XMM-Newton’s can achieve.

It is planned to continually update the catalogue as XMM-Newton charts its way through the stars. This will cover at least 80 percent of the sky, leaving a tremendous legacy for the future.

Original Source: ESA Portal

Book Review: The Sky at Einstein’s Feet


Thought experiments highlight people’s power to perceive that which is not directly in front of their eyes. Light, that capricious, expansive particle-wave, stretches our perception to the roots of time. Yet astronomers can use the nuances of wily, scattering light to whittle an image of the universe, as shown in William Keel’s book The Sky at Einstein’s Feet. In it he shows that though the carving isn’t complete, we are beginning to perceive a substantive structure of stars in the sky.

The tricks of light were being discovered via magnetism and electricity when Einstein formulated his ideas of relativity. With this, our understanding of light stepped far into the unseeable. Further, light’s speed became a standard yardstick, even less controvertible than time. At about the same moment in history, the new equipment of astronomers was adding greater detail to the mapping of the night sky. Alongside stars there were separate galaxies, super clusters, sporadic pulsars, and deep black holes. Each has a distinct signature in the universe and a special basis in the realm of physics. Using their individuality, together with an understanding of the overall physical processes, leads us to a clearer perception of the universe’s extents, even though we inhabit just one small corner.

Keel, in his book, wants to share with a wide audience the impact of relativity on astronomy. To do this, he introduces many of the subtleties of relativity and the way that astronomy either takes advantage or accommodates them. He starts by exploring the influence of relativity. He describes processes such as photoionization that led to astronomical spectroscopy which in itself led to atomic identification through absorption or emission lines. Then there’s the more exotic superluminal motion that appears to display something moving faster than light. More importantly, this can indicate shapes of dust clouds. Applying the Penrose-Terrell rotation effect to the jets of quasars helps explain their appearance. As Keel writes, these are just some of the factors that astronomers need keep in mind when considering the results from night time imaging.

However, even given the book’s title, Keel isn’t purely assessing relativity in astronomy. Rather, he’s acknowledging its import in recent interpretations. For instance, gravitational lensing, which also has a firm basis in relativity, is a valuable tool to gauge distances of very far galaxies as well as masses of interposing galaxies. White dwarfs, the incredible dense objects often found circling other stars, have a huge pressure due to quantum allocations. But their spectroscopic absorption lines tell of a gravitational red shift on top of the Doppler red shift. Keel notes these and other processes and methods used to establish more relevance to the objects of the night. Though he often uses relativity as a link, the book’s contents most point to a desire to share the lore of astronomy.

And as with most technical books on astronomy, there’s a lot of references throughout. Keel includes the names of many prominent researches and many observatories together with their equipment’s particular adaptations. Though at times the reading is styled as if for a research paper, it isn’t dry. Keel includes anecdotes that continually raise the serendipitous nature of research as well as the pitfalls of being at the leading edge. As well, clear, concise explanations introduce most new terms, such as his description of an electron’s motion to explain synchrotron radiation. This, together with descriptive introductions to chapters and a good selection of illustrations make the book a well detailed, enjoyable read for the average amateur astronomer and those interested in the physics behind the pretty pictures of the night sky.

With this book, Keel should achieve his objective of giving a wide audience an understanding of the impact of relativity in astronomy. This works for whether the reader is knowledgeable of relativity and is interested in some applications or the reader is knowledgeable in astronomy and wants to know more about the reason for what they see through the eyepiece. However, for those potential readers who have neither background, this book may be either too detailed or too specialist. Keel doesn’t provide foundations for either of these fields to the likely confusion of the uninitiated. Thus, this book is best as a tool or aid to help blend theory with observation.

A hundred years of using relativity as first introduced by Einstein has given us great rewards. We have a better understanding of the constituents of atoms and how they influence the light from stars. We also know that gravity can effect mass as much as light. William Keel in his book The Sky at Einstein’s Feet gives the reader a change to merge visual images of the night sky with imaginative theory for greater rewards in astronomical viewing.

Review by Mark Mortimer

Read more reviews online or purchase a copy from Amazon.com

What’s Up This Week – May 2 – May 7, 2006

M53. Image credit: Credit: REU Program/NOAO/AURA/NSF. Click to enlarge.
Greetings, fellow SkyWatchers! Have you been following the comet’s trail? If not, there’s observing tips on how to locate 73/P Schwassmann-Wachmann easily. Get out your binoculars or telescopes as we prepare to journey to the Moon and beyond ths week – because…

Here’s what’s up!

Tuesday, May 2 – UPDATE: For those interested in the whereabouts of the C-component of comet 73/P Schwassmann-Wachmann, look no further than Hercules. As the week opens, you’ll find it cruising through the center of the “keystone” (see SkyHound’s map) and easily visible to small binoculars under less than optimal conditions. Be sure to let the constellation rise at least to the upper third of the sky before attempting observations and enjoy!

For early evening viewers, tonight’s Moon provides a great opportunity to visit telescopically with some smaller features located within the fully disclosed Mare Crisium area. Look for two bright mountainous areas near the terminator on the central western border of Crisium. These two regions include the Olivium and Lavinium Promontoriums. Voyaging across Crisium’s smooth floor toward the east, you will see the small punctuations of Craters Picard to the south and Pierce to the north. Try to follow these features over the lunar cycle and see how many nights you can continue to see them.

As the Moon sets, let’s have a look at three entirely different studies around the constellation Corvus, the “Crow.”

The most recognizable shape of Corvus is an irregular box of visible stars southwest of Spica. The southeastern-most star is Beta Corvi. Look around two finger-width’s south for faint star SAO 180965. By aiming your low power scope or large binoculars there, you will find 8.2 magnitude globular cluster M68 to the northeast. The several hundred thousand stars comprising M68 spread out over a region 110 light-years in diameter. Located about 35,000 light-years away, it’s a nice challenge.

Now head for the northeast star in the box, and you notice that it’s a nice visual pair – Eta and Delta. Around two finger-widths southwest will put you in the area to find planetary nebula NGC 4361. This fairly large, irregular, 10th magnitude planetary has a faint central star surrounded by a “square fuzzy shell” of nebulosity. Notice how it appears to flare outwardly as the eye moves about the field of view. Perhaps there’s more to this planetary than meets the eye!

To locate our next study, just head 11 degrees (very slightly more than a fist width) due west of Spica to locate the Sombrero Galaxy – M104. Showing surprising structure through binoculars and small scopes, this 8.3 magnitude, near edge-on spiral is one of the most massive known. Mid-sized scopes should look for M104’s large central bulge and extended tightly wound arms. Viewers with large aperture will easily see the dark lane breaking across the galaxy’s equator through the bulge of the nucleus.

Be sure to look for a striking “Scorpio-shaped” asterism of equally bright stars just northwest of the mighty “Sombrero!”

Wednesday, May 3 – Tonight the Moon is the prominent sky feature, so why not venture to the surface and visit one of the oldest features left on the visible lunar side? Start by identifying two prominent craters in the southeast quadrant – Metius and Fabricus. While viewing the area around them, note that Fabricus’ walls actually intrude on Metius – pointing to a younger age of formation. Around Fabricus, but not including Metius, is the boundary of a mountain-walled plain extending into the terminator. High power will reveal many breaks in its hexagonal walls surrounding a floor marred by many smaller craters and fine fissures. This is Jannsen. Look for three prominent interior craters, as well as an ancient rima falling near the shadow’s edge. It may not seem exciting, but remember Jannsen could go back to the time when the Moon first formed – more than four billion years ago!

Even under bright skies, we can still study open clusters – right? Well, not really. Have you noticed how few there are in the spring sky? In fact, the ones that can be seen are rapidly dropping off the edge of the world to the west. (Oops, there goes another one!) They are associated with the winter Milky Way. That’s why open clusters have another name – “galactic clusters!”

Instead, let’s have a look at another interesting subset of things visible in the night sky – galaxies located near bright stars. For instance, Phecda is the southeastern star in the bowl of the Big Dipper, but look again. If you center on Phecda and shift it slightly northwest, you will turn up 9.8 magnitude M109, which is over 55 million light-years further away than its “companion” star.

Tonight Jupiter, with its four bright moons and striking cloudtop features, comes into its own as it reaches opposition. Be prepared for whatever sky conditions permit you to see among the many fine features associated with this mirthful member of our solar family!

Thursday, May 4 – Tonight we’ll continue our lunar explorations as we look for the “three ring circus” of easily identified craters – Theophilus, Cyrillus, and Catherina. Are you ready to discover a very conspicuous lunar feature that was never officially named? Cutting its way across Mare Nectaris from Theophilus to shallow crater Beaumont in the south, you’ll see a long, thin, bright line. What you are looking at is an example of a lunar dorsum – nothing more than a wrinkle or low ridge. Chances are good that this ridge is just a “wave” in the lava flow that congealed when Mare Nectaris formed. This particular dorsa is quite striking tonight because of low illumination angle. Has it been named? Yes. It is unofficially known as “Dorsum Beaumont,” but by whatever name it is called, it remains a distinct feature you’ll continue to enjoy!

It’s still a bit early to begin viewing Jupiter, so let’s look at a double star while we wait for it to gain sky position. Named in honor of King Charles II of England by Astronomer Royal Edmund Halley in 1725, Cor Caroli “the Heart of Charles” (Alpha Canes Venatici) is a splendid example of a bright easily resolved “double of color.” At magnitude 2.9, Cor Caroli is best found by moving a little more than a fist width southwest of Eta Ursa Majoris (Alkaid.) Although the pair is not resolvable in low power binoculars, just about any telescope will distinguish between the pale yellow primary and nicely “spaced” blue secondary.

Tonight Jupiter appears some 44.6 arc seconds in diameter – almost twice as large as the planet Mars ever appears from Earth. At its current apparent size, it only takes 40x magnification to make the planet’s disk appear the size of the Moon unaided. This magnification will reveal the three main cloudtop features in the planet’s atmosphere. Look for the darkly textured northern and southern equatorial belts (NEB & SEB) separated by the bright equatorial zone (EZ). These belts and zone were first seen as early as 1664 and several astronomers including Niccolo Zucchi, Gian Dominico Cassini, Robert Hooke, and Gilles-François Gottigniez are credited with their discovery. This same magnification easily distinguishes the four bright satellites as well. These moons were first reported by Galileo Galilei after a week of observing beginning January 7, 1610.

Friday, May 5 – On this date in 1961, Alan Shepard became the first American in “space.” It was only a 15 minute suborbital ride aboard Mercury craft Freedom 7… But what a ride!

For moon watchers tonight, we celebrate 36 years of space exploration as the Apollo 11 landing site now becomes visible. For telescopes and binoculars the landing area will be found near the terminator along the southern edge of Mare Tranquillitatis. For those who would like a real challenge, try spotting small craters Armstrong, Aldrin, and Collins just east of easy craters Sabine and Ritter. No scope? No problem. Find the dark round area on the lunar northeastern limb – Mare Crisium. Then locate the dark area below that – Mare Fecundatatis. Now look mid-way along the terminator for the dark area that is Mare Tranquillitatis. The bright point west where it joins Mare Nectaris further south is the target for the first men on the Moon.

We were there…

Still up for adventure? What about an observation that happened more than 240 years ago? Like Charles Messier, Johan Hevelius (1611 – 1687) kept a log of things seen while sweeping the night sky using a small telescope. The third object on Hevelius list of 16 “Nebulosae” (designated Hev 1496) came to the attention of Charles Messier who – based on Hevelius’ description – swept the same part of the sky in an attempt to locate it. Failing to discover anything nebulous in the region, Messier added the one and only double star to his famed list as M40.

Start at Mizar and Alcore, and hop about a finger-width northwest. Look for a pair of 9th magnitude stars separated by 49 arc seconds with the fainter 9.3 magnitude component oriented east-northeast. Try turning high power binoculars toward this pair – it’s just possible you may re-discover Hevelius’ “Nebulosa!”

Saturday, May 6 – Tonight is a wonderful chance for binoculars and small scopes to study the Moon. Craters Aristotle and Eudoxus to the north are easily apparent, along with the Caucasus and Apennine mountain range. Looking for a spectacular lunar feature? Look no further than the Valles Alpes. Known also as the “Alpine Valley,” this deep slash across the northern surface is easily visible and lighting conditions will be just right to explore its 1.5 to 21 kilometer wide, and 177 kilometer long expanse.

Even with bright moonlit skies, we still have the opportunity to study doubles – so let’s head towards Corvus and see if we can collect enough starlight to resolve Delta Corvi. Look for a distant and relatively faint companion!

Sunday, May 7 – Tonight, we’ll have a look at crater Eratosthenes. Just slightly north of lunar center and on the terminator, this easily spotted feature dangles at the end of the Apennine Mountain range like a yo-yo caught on a string. Its rugged walls and central peaks make for excellent viewing. If you look closely at the mountains northeast of Eratosthenes, you will see the high peak of Mons Wolff. Named for the Dutch philosopher and mathematician, this outstanding feature reaches 35 kilometers in height. To the southwest of Eratosthenes you may also spot the ruined remains of crater Stadius. Very little is left of its walls and the floor is dotted with small strikes. Near the twin pair of punctuations to its south lie the remains of Surveyor 2!

Two nights ago, Jupiter came as close as it’s going to get to Earth. Now let’s have a “deeper” look at this giant planet. There’s much more to be seen at high power and through stable skies. Wait until Jupiter gains some altitude, then magnify to catch more of those whirling “bands on the run!”

At mid-magnifications the two equatorial belts (NEB and SEB) can be seen flanked by two lesser belts – the North Temperate Belt (NTB) and the South Temperate Belt (STB). These thin and sometimes almost undetectable belts are found at latitudes that move more slowly around the planet’s girth than its equator. Like the NEB and SEB, they come about as a combination of conditions – winds, temperature, and chemical composition. They gang up to darken the albedo (reflectivity) of different parts of Jupiter’s atmosphere under the influence of all the energy unleashed by Jupiter’s less than ten hour rotation.

While observing Jupiter’s features, keep in mind that you are looking through various depths into its atmosphere. In general, things of a blue tint are deeper than things brown. The reds are highest – just above the whites. Unlike our Earth, most of the energy driving “weather” on Jupiter comes from Jupiter itself – since it emits more heat energy than it receives from the Sun. Of course, there is that “whirling dervish” of a rotational speed – some 45,000 kilometers per hour!

May all your journeys be at light speed… ~Tammy Plotner with Jeff Barbour.

Shearing Storms on Saturn

Detailed view of Saturn’s clouds. Image credit: NASA/JPL/SSI. Click to enlarge
This clear view of Saturn shows the planet’s stormy bands, especially near the equator. The northern boundary of the bright equatorial zone is shearing against the band to the north, and producing tremendous turbulence. Two storms are also merging together in the planet’s southern hemisphere. This photo was taken on March 16, 2006 when Cassini was approximately 2 million kilometers (1.3 million miles) from Saturn.

This remarkably detailed view of Saturn’s clouds reveals waves at the northern boundary of the bright equatorial zone, presumably associated both with the strong wind shear there and also the difference in density across the boundary with the band to the north. The intense eastward-flowing jet at the equator makes the edges of the equatorial zone among the most strongly sheared on the planet.

To the south, two dark ovals embrace, while dark ring shadows blanket the north. The moon Janus (181 kilometers, or 113 miles across) occupies a mere two pixels beneath the rings, at right of center.

The image was taken with the Cassini spacecraft wide-angle camera on March 16, 2006, using a filter sensitive to wavelengths of infrared light centered at 728 nanometers. The view was acquired at a distance of approximately 2 million kilometers (1.3 million miles) from Saturn. The image scale is 118 kilometers (73 miles) per pixel.

The Cassini-Huygens mission is a cooperative project of NASA, the European Space Agency and the Italian Space Agency. The Jet Propulsion Laboratory, a division of the California Institute of Technology in Pasadena, manages the mission for NASA’s Science Mission Directorate, Washington, D.C. The Cassini orbiter and its two onboard cameras were designed, developed and assembled at JPL. The imaging operations center is based at the Space Science Institute in Boulder, Colo.

For more information about the Cassini-Huygens mission visit http://saturn.jpl.nasa.gov . The Cassini imaging team homepage is at http://ciclops.org .

Original Source: NASA/JPL/SSI News Release